It’s one-off gag comics again this week, folks! That means we’re back to the MWF schedule.
It was Thanksgiving weekend, which is how I justify putting up this mostly-copy-pasted-and-hastily-edited older strip which I already ran on Tumblr a week or so ago. But don’t worry, even though today’s comic is really about Frank Miller instead of the ups and downs of Occupy Wall Street, I can rest assure that the bitter revenge for my laziness will come in the form of the heated political discussion that is bound to occur below.
Let’s get our parroted talking points ready!
For a second I thought you’d accidentally re-uploaded this. I really like this one.
I’m pretty sure you could just do comics like this for the whole week and still make me laugh.
Pssst, like Batman would get an Apple product. I bet Apple couldn’t even get the shape right.
(Insert generic political bitching here)
(insert sad attempt at rational discourse)
(Insert off-base ad hominem attack)
That’s invalid! Therefore your entire platform is wrong!
Strawman, concern trolling, GODWIN’S LAW VIOLATION!! Bwoop! Bwoop! Chaos and madness!
Desperate attempt to derail political argument and get everybody to be friends again with a tangentially related penis joke!
We’re sick of dick jokes, troll! (calls political figure Satan)
wingardium leviosa
Bitchy Comment, Bitchy Comment, Dick Joke?
… request to turn back time
And rectify my wrong
Repetition of
The Title of the Song
Explicitly stating the moral of the story, and awkwardly working in… the Movie Title.
LOUD NOISES!!!!
MEMEEEEEEE SPAAAAAAAM
Commentary on the appropriateness or lack thereof of the previous commenter’s gravatar.
Complaint about comments on gravatars.
Burma Shave.
Intentional logical fallacies representing the opposing party, deliberate mockery of said fallacies’ weak points, comparisons to Nazis, ad homenim counter-arguments, overuse of caps and italics, bad grammar, unnecessary comments on the mothers of the opposing party(s), accusations of trolling, self-righteous essays, and so on.
Attacking own argument with a different strawman account, forming a tangential argument between the accounts about ethics and morality while framing the opposing side of ignorance on delicate matters, proceeded by disorganized trolling with fully blatant use of compromising arguments and tactics.
Baseless accusation of censorship and hypocracy [sic]! Assertion that political content has ruined my enjoyment of the strip and “threat” to never read the comic or comment ever again!
Allegedly humorous comment using phrasing similar to a Godwin’s Law invocation to compare Hitler to himself.
Accusation of racism
Complaint about generic meta-commentary.
*onomatopoeia*
Meta-complaint regarding generalized complaint about generic meta-commentary.
Expletive!
Follow-up complaint regarding lack of ability to edit previous comment to insert the term “self-referential”.
Mild self-deprecating joke describing lack of legal stimulative substance intake.
no but really batman:year one? fells kind of like a fucked up richie rich kind of thing
Wouldn’t Frank Miller get off on being placed in a real-life film noir scenario?
Fortunately, from this angle you can’t see the moist spot on the crotch of his pants.
I was wondering where I’d seen this before. I read your entire Tumblr, incidentally. Mostly out of boredom, but partially because for some warped reason I like it when you put up old art.
So, is he wearing a hat to hide the gunshot wound from the last time?
OK, I give up, what’s this about? I get that he’s supposed to write an OWS story, but I don’t get the joke. Can anyone explain this to me?
I’m serious (no trollo)
Bolded link in the description, click it.
Thanks David.
Really… The comic get other mood after reading the text of the link.
The first reply… Epic.
In summary:
“Me Frank Miller! Rarrgle blargle hippies! Rargle nargle, get a job! Blargle raarrrgghha ooga glargle Al Qaida!!
Hahahaha, that was somewhat accurate.
That comment is made even better by your avatar.
you forgot to mention ‘Whores’.
No, that’s clearly a pony.
Ponies need to work their way through medical school too. Or is that strippers? I think hookers are business school…memes be confoozin’
Ah-ha, I liked this one. I was hoping it would end up on here eventually, but just figured it wouldn’t because the panels were recycled.
But the joke is funny enough to excuse some copypasta!
Incidentally, I find it odd that Miller isn’t facing repercussions for this. I mean, in most other jobs, PR is just part of your responsibilities, and being a massive dick to your fanbase usually gets SOME response from the shareholders.
I think it would have gone idfferently if he was writting for anyone right now. To my knowledge he doesn’t really have any series being pulished, so no comic company realy wants to get involved.
That, and by now the fanbase is kind of accustomed to Frank Miller being a dick in general.
Well, in most industries a lot of things comic book companies get away with wouldn’t be allowed. But it is comic books, so the niche fandom argues and buys and argues and no one else really cares.
Witness Dave Sim.
Harlan Ellison.
Being a dick is his whole routine.
This is true. I saw him once, and his talk basically consisted of accusing the audience of ignorance. What a prick.
Great writer though.
I think it’s mostly that people already know Miller is crazy, and that this is simply another manifestation of it, and thus nothing to get all worked up about.
Huh. He’s pissed off about OWS and called them mean names. If you’re going to pick on a group, at least pick on something that’s actually wrong with them. He’s just pointing fingers and name-calling, not pointing out legitimate problems.
The hypocrisy accusation intruiges me, though. It’s virtually impossible to live a middle class life in the United States without directly benefiting at least a few corporations with unethical practices. The implications of not supporting unethical corporations is far reaching for average people in the USA, so It’s hard not to feed the corporations that do so many terrible things.
Given certain ones have gotten unstable enough to have had to set up safe zones for women to sleep, I’d say that while calling the group overall rapists is name-calling, it also addresses a serious issue that I find highly concerning. (Granted, I am a man whose girlfriend is staying at one of the occupy camps, so, I admit I may be paranoid there.)
America isn’t as civilized as we like to think we are. That being said, Occupy Wall Street is too broad a movement for the necessity or lack thereof of safe zones to say anything about them.
Other than I suppose that they aren’t ignoring the potentiality for victimization, which is more than you can say for Penn State and the Catholic Church heyoooooo
Setting up safe zones addresses a serious issue.
Calling the protesters rapists – ‘protesters’ being a group that, among other things, includes the women in it – is just Miller being a vacuous shithead.
Batman wouldn’t use Apple. He use Wayne Tech given that Bruce Wayne funded the guy.
Look on the bright side. At least there’s not much whores in it.
Well, depending on who you get your OWS news from…
Prostitutes: more reliable than Fox News.
I gotta say i found this worth quite a chuckle. And I reallllly am surprised to read that from Frank Miller.
Good comic Willis!
So, Frank Miller foresaw the future?
There is only one proper response to something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ5TajZYW6Y
Curse you, Lewis H.
Regarding the Miller rant itself, the only really appropriate responses are either:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
The Fark headline for this stuff pretty much summed it all up perfectly.
“Frank Miller yells at cloud.”
So, Frank Miller is actually Abe Simpson?
Can’t be. Even Abe Simpson is at least semi-pleasant to “all those young whipper-snappers.”
“…we wore a turnip on our belt, as was the style of the day… zzzzzzzzz”
The thing that amuses me is that considering the kind of protagonists Frank writes of late, you’d almost think his rant about OWS was complimentary.
Who is this kidnapping Frank Miller?
…it’s Spider-car, isn’t it? THAT CAR IS A MENACE!
J Jonah Jamison Car is enraged!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7deEWu9UaA
Wow Frank. Just… wow. Funny comic, though
Dave, I love ya, but sometimes it seems like you make strips like these just to make your comments section go apeshit.
40 comments in and so far no angry trolling, impressively enough. If that was Dave’s plan it may have just backfired.
That’s because he’s an Islamo-pagan-socialist-nazi-hippie who wants Obama and his secret Nigerian-Al Qaida friends to win! And WHORES!! Rargle blargle!!
Rex, as long as you have that avatar, all of your comments must end with “rargle blargle!” Anything else is unacceptable.
I hereby dub that avatar Twilight Blargle.
Hahaha, what? That entire article. Is he… Is he joking? Frank Miller. I mean, he actually, for real, called them rapists. He straight-up said “Islamicism” was his enemy. Is this some sort of straw man/sarcasm/irony thing, where he pretends to be moron to highlight how stupid he thinks the other side is?
Islamicism
HAVE YOU SELF-INDULGENT HIPPIES HEARD OF WORDS LIKE this word i literally just made up
Does Frank Miller just fill in his mad-libs these days by writing in either “al-Qaeda” or “WHORES!”, regardless of context?
Now I actually want to do that with a mad-libs…
“WHORES! went to the al-Qaeda with a/an WHORES!, which he/she/they WHORES! to al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda was WHORES!”
Jeeze, this is worse than playing Steve Ditko mad-libs.
I should probably know this already, but how does one play Ditko Madlibs?
In Ditko mad-libs, every word is actually an objectivist slogan, inserted at random and regardless of any logical context.
I don’t think objectivists are automatically crazy, and I figure you can probably even make an objectivism-themed comic without it coming across as the ramblings of a lunatic mind.
Steve Ditko, however, comes across as a raving madman whenever he brings his political/philosophical views into his comics (so every time he has drawn a comic since some time in the mid-sixties).
I would like to state for the record that I am a fan of both Frank Miller and Steve Ditko, but they’re both loonies. Dave Sim too.
Nobody wants to play Dave Sim mad-libs.
Anybody else half-expecting him to start wandering down the street in his tighty whities, randomly shouting “THIS! IS! WALLSTREET!” and trying to kick people into traffic?
You know this is going to be a difficult post when I have to preface it by saying that I aint trollin.
Guys. Genuine question. What do the OWS and Occupy London people actually want? I mean, they make a lot of very broad statements about injustice and political inequality, but what do they want to change, exactly? What do they want legislation for? What is it they are actually trying to achieve, and by what exact means? I spoke to some people at OL, and was even directed to a website. I can’t find a single thing that they actually want to do, which is… well, it’s just odd.
I’ve heard it said that OWS’ message is unclear, which comes from them being a somewhat disorganized protest. The main goal is to eliminate corporate influence in government, i.e lobbyists.
Despite what individual members of Occupy may want, (and I’ve heard enough to go from laughter to bitchslapping someone- what? the dipshit deserved it), the main two points (across the board) are:
Get the money out of politics. Most often cited was legislation to blunt the effect of the Citizens United ruling, which lets boundless sums enter the campaign process.
Reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to restore the Glass-Steagall Act – law on the books since the Depression, (something that helped keep banks from being total dicks), which was repealed in the late 90s- essentially allowing the clusterfuck of banking insanity in the 2000s.
Companys legaly being considered people is something else they want recalled (as you can tell on a lot of the placards)
The corporations being legally classified as people is something I’d like to see repealed on the simple basis that it just doesn’t make sense. I have wondered for years since I first heard about it, and I have yet to be able to figure out what kind of drugs they were taking that that sounded logical to them.
The idea behind corporations as people is basically so corporations can own property. Only people and the government can own property, I believe, under our laws. If they weren’t people, only individuals within the corporation could own the company’s capitol, which creates some major problems if that person, say for example, just want’s to keep all that shit. Essentially it’s to protect against C.E.O.’s taking all the money… and… running away… with it… Hmm…
There are also legal ramifications. A corporation as a person can be sued, whereas a corporation not acting as a person cannot be sued. I think.
Whatever the specifics are, the purpose is to protect against fraud.
Corporations counting as people is supposed to be only in a limited way for specific laws, because it otherwise they can’t do certain things necessary for running a business.
HOWEVER: Recently legislation, especially that case where the Supreme Court ruled Freedom of Speech applied to them and their money, has been treating them as people in additional respects, primarily those that are advantageous to them, which not only goes against the intent, but makes them even more incredibly powerful since many of the limiting factors that apply to individuals still don’t apply.
Basically, it started out as an okay idea and then people started stretching the rules to change the system into something more abusable.
I think that if companies can legally be considered people they should be allowed ot be sentenced to prison and be eligible for the death penalty.
They are. But, a corporation doesn’t have a physical body. The CEOs and all that aren’t the corporation, so that’s why corporations are so powerful. Up until recently, and even still, if you were CEO of a corporation, as long as any of the horrible things done were because of the corporation, no one could be punished.
OWS wants to keep corporations from doing what unions have been doing for decades.
No seriously, unions pour more money into politics than any corporation outside of AT&T. Check it…http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php
Check out all the little donkeys… Even Goldman (not even in the top 5) gives more to Dem candidates… No wonder finance reform is half-assed!
Compare major contributers between the left and right. Unions contribute to the dems, but not as much as large corporate interests contribute to the GOP. That’s the reason republicans have been working their darnedest to break Unions right now.
Except that on that page, most of the high end corporate contributors have that little fence symbol… Meaning they give equally to both sides. You have to go quite a ways down before you see a red elephant.
Phew, I was worried for a moment that nobody would start an actual argument. Thank god.
I try to fulfill all requests in a timely manner.
Let’s also remember that table is cumulative. The world is very different when it comes to campaigns than it was 22 years ago.
In 2008, Unions weren’t even in the top 20 donors for the Presidential election.
Too lazy to cite?
Because I’m not.
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list_stfed.php?order=A
2008 donation data, most recent. Unions lead the pack again. Goldman? # 44 on this list.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00006424
You should note I DID say Presidential. Just because I assumed you’d reference your own source doesn’t make me lazy
Look, we can get into fights about this all day, and we’re totally ignoring 527s, but don’t try to call me out – but while I’m “lazy,” my poli sci degree did teach me how to read statistics.
Large cummulative datasets which don’t show context are useless for proving anything. Context is king when it comes to numbers.
For the most part, they’d actually like to get *both* corporations and Unions out of the “who can purchase the most elected officials” game. Corporations tend to get more heat because of their centralized nature; IOW, it’s easier for a corporation to have specific goals and lobbying points, generally, than a Union, though certainly not always. “What’s good for GE” is often a smaller and more concrete set of goals than “What’s good for The Allied Association Of Welders, Electrical Workers, Stage Hands, Cab Drivers, Pet Groomers, Nuclear Power Technicians, and humidor assemblers”, despite the fact that GE has hands in every market.
There’s also an argument to be made that corrupt goals that benefit unions tend to also benefit lots of people outside of unions, whereas corrupt goals that benefit a corporation tend to only benefit other equally-large corporations, but I won’t make that argument here.
Ultimately, though, one of the big reasons for the hate being directed preferentially at corporations rather than unions in the “buying politicians” game is because of basic structure. Even a massively-corrupt and ginormous union is, by the very nature of unions, designed upon a fundamentally democratic “one person, one vote” system. All one needs (theoretically) to participate in the internal workings of a union is to be a member of that union. This gives Unions, even as I said the hugely corrupt ones, a nature that interfaces better with the ideal of our political system. Whereas Corporations, even the very best and moral and uncorrupt ones, are built upon a fundamentally feudalistic base. The more you own of the company, the more of a vote you have, and the only way to participate at all is to buy in, at which point you may have absolutely nothing to do with the corporation at all beyond simply owning a share of it. Huge blocks of voting-stock may be controlled by extremely few people, relatively, or even a single person. I’m not saying that this is necessarily a bad thing, mind you, nor am I suggesting that corporations shouldn’t be organized that way or anything, it’s just their nature. It’s a fundamentally non-democratic nature, though, so when two entities both spend oodles upon oodles of money influencing the political system (and campaign contributions are but one of those methods of exerting influence), more often than not the centrally-run oligarchical financially-focused entity is going to look worse than the democratically-run gathering of schmoes. Even when the one is perfectly moral and the other is corrupt as all get-out.
http://slyoyster.hypervocal.com/cheap-thrills/2011/decades-old-calvin-and-hobbes-strip-succinctly-explains-occupy-wall-street-movement/
Not to sound like a troll, but this is intended to add some additional comic relief as well. Parrot talking points as Willis asked at the top? I prefer parrotheads myself. My political leanings? I’m a Marxist. I follow the teachings of Groucho.
Prolly want a cracker!
PROLLY DEMANDS CRACKERS AND DISMANTLING OF CORPORATE OLIGARCHY!
But… but the corporate oligarchy is RUN by crackers…
Badum bum!
Getta job, ya badum bum!
Serious question: how much copy-paste do you normally do in strips like this one? It often looks like you redraw with subtle differences, and given how much you like to mess with everyone’s heads, I would expect you to go the extra mile. But some of the lines look identical panel to panel. Is it ever 100% redraw, or just as much as needed to keep the panels distinct?
Pure curiosity, not criticism. Your style is one of my favorites.
Frank Miller looks so adorable in this comic.
I just read the article and all i can do is wonder what this dude’s parents were like. What is he trying to say (if you leave out the ad-hominem fluff)? That owning a piece of new technology is hypocritical if you’re protesting some particular beneficiaries of a forced wealth-transfer? I don’t see it. It also seems ironic that he calls the protesters potentially harmful to America, when the wars he praises are suicidally expensive themselves. That’s just my opinion, though.
Btw, kind of weird that your reaction is to make a cartoon about him being kidnapped and told to do things against his will.
Polly wanna cracker, WAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
Reason #505 that Dave Willis is a better comics creator than Ryan Sohmer…
… Why? I mean, yes, I agree, but I can’t see why this comic in particular prompted that statement.
Well for one thing, it shows how Willis puts the punch line in the last panel rather than the first.
http://www.the-gutters.com/comic/218-wes-huffor
Because Willis actually re-uses his OWN joke, and does so in a way that’s not horrible.
He also does it in a way that doesn’t make me want to use the Old Spice Man’s voice for FM.
(Was it just me, or did anyone else whistle the ‘Old Spice’ theme at the end of the Gutters strip?)
My God, that’s not even satire! That’s just a fucking mad libs! WHY ARE PEOPLE GIVING SOHMER MONEY TO MAKE A CARTOON GARBLARDGJKLKJKJ
I have the feeling he’s been the one giving money to enable his career, just going by the sheer volume and number of people involved in his projects, all with him as lackluster writer. I haven’t followed his story, so maybe his origin is already written up somewhere.
He does have a feel for what his fans enjoy, though. Credit where it’s due.
Don’t forget the creepy WOMEN OWE ME SEX jokes!
http://leasticoulddo.com/comic/20111110
With a heaping spoonful of ‘Fat women are ugly’!
So anyway this has been a fun tangent.
Only 505? This is damning Willis with faint praise. The Holodomor wrote better comics than Ryan Sohmer.
it’s like the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition. just because there’s one number shown doesn’t mean there aren’t more, & they are numbered in no particular order in case someone tries to get uppity about it.
+10
…Because he’s more reliably funny, whereas Gutters only manages to be amusing every ten or twenty strips and the rest are blah at best?
Once in a while he makes something good but it’s probably not enough to justify the series. For example, I remain fond of this one:
http://www.the-gutters.com/comic/54-chad-hurd
But I had to go a whole year back to find something memorable and funny.
I might be over thinking it but sadly the finer points of this comic escape me, is this criticising his criticism of the movement? Is it criticising the movement? Both? Neither?
criticizing his criticism, in particular how far not just his personality, but also his politics seem to have changed since the days when his writing was any good.
Ah so their demands represents his arguments?
Thank you for the help
http://www.halolz.com/2011/11/14/video-batman-is-the-one-percent/
seemed relevant.
Is ^^
Okay good I thought I was the only one who noticed that Frank was trying to steal the title of biggest right-wing crank in comic books from Steve Ditko
I’m just waiting for him to sign on with Neal Adams’ plate tectonics denialism.
should have challenged him to write a women that wasn’t an over sexualized prostitute i’m willing to bet he’d die in that room. Then again he should die in their anyway for making The Spirit. Way to fuck up simple concepts Frank
Oh and the lady working the Apple store is a prostitute.
But she has a heart of gold… well, not literal gold… you know what I mean.
Hunh??
I thought Gin & Vodka (that’s what I’m calling ‘em) got rid of this guy (in the SP-verse, at least).
WTF, Willis.
It makes me sad to see the pianist who once delighted us with “Music Box Dancer” has been reduced to this.
Regardless of anyone’s thought’s on OWS I think we can all agree on one thing Frank Miller is completely Bat Crap Insane.
HAW HAW HAW HAW XD Had to be done!
Trope invoked:http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheRevolutionWillNotBeVilified
Sounds like a lot of his stuff not just Batman: Year One. I was getting flashes of Martha Washington too.
I miss Martha.
I remember getting Batman: Year One as a kid. In retrospect I really don’t know what my parents were thinking giving me that comic.
So I guess he managed to write a story without WHORESWHORESWHORES in it last time. Good job, Frankie! I’m proud of you.
If it weren’t for the first panel, I could have believed that he was still trapped there all this time and they merely gave him a hat between strips.
I think that was HOLY TERROR.
Ironically, it’d have been better with Whores.
The crazy thing is, I remember back in 2006 when the book was called Holy Terror Batman! That’s right, it was a Batman story.
But apparently he changed it, and it’s just some generic superhero fighting terrorists.
I want to say that DC passed on Holy Terror Batman, so he pretty much just stuck another character in where Batman would have been.
Thank goodness for that. It was bad enough when the Joker acquired diplomatic immunity as an Iranian ambassador.
Yeah, “Death in the Family” was pretty lame.
Maybe if THE SPIRIT hadnt been received (justifiably, I might add) as such a f*-up movie, Miller might be nicer to everyone….
Oh, who am I kidding…..
I LIKED the spirit.
So did I! It was CraAzZZy!
I can only assume that it’s a horrible insult to some source material somewhere, but I don’t know the source material, and on its own merits the Spirit movie is an entertaining farce that embraces its own stupidity so thoroughly it comes right out the other side and become brilliance again.
I have mixed feelings about OWS. I’m a med school graduate who’s taking his licensing exam in the next year and working as an interpreter, but I also know that not everyone has my particular skillset and applying a “just get a job, fuckwits” is a fucking retarded argument – some people with perfectly legitimate skillsets are being left in the cold because companies want to cut corners, by outsourcing, piling on the work to other employees, or whatnot – my brother (an engineer) is victim to this, unfortunately, so it hits close to home for me despite being, supposedly, in the 1%.
That being said, I live in Manhattan at the moment, and some of the actions of the OWS movement strike me as counterproductive. A lot of what they do are hurting people who are just like them – trying to get by. A lot of the small businesses near these movements are suffering due to OWS people going in to use their facilities and basically kind of lounging around there. One OWS actually ended up causing a ruckus on my front porch and police had to be called to take her away. I just don’t understand how stuff like this can further the cause – you’re alienating a lot of people who are also part of your 99%.
Sometimes even the tragedy of the commons doesn’t explain the short-sighted behaviour of some people. Some folks never see the incentive to behave responsibly toward themselves, let alone anyone else.
You know how some musicians start making ridiculous demands once they finally secure a decent contract? It’s weird what the illusion of freedom can do to us.
If you’re just taking your licensing exam, I kind of doubt you’re one of the top 1% wealthiest Americans, unless you’ve inherited a lot of money.
There’s something wrong with Frank Miller. I don’t think people realise how it can be for actors and artists and people like that… for example, if you’re a brand manager at a company that makes plumbing fixtures, and one day you start confiding in people that the colour blue is plotting against you, someone will probably point you in the direction the medical profession and you’ll get meds. If you’re an artist and you start screaming the same thing, people assume it’s part of your creativity and you don’t get meds. As long as you can still do your job, who knows what’s going on inside your mad brain?
Frank Miller is a wonderful artist. Give him some anti-psychotics and he’ll be fine.
Oh, but the “[X] is plotting against me/us” meme is so ingrained in humanity’s psyche that you’ll never get it out.
No matter whether X is equal to “the color blue,” “the Islamicists,” “the Man,” “the Jews,” “the Communists,” “the Freemasons,” “them furriners” or “the 1%.”
As long as it means we don’t have to blame OURSELVES, we’ll blame anyone else put in front of us as a convenient scapegoat. It’s all the same to us. (Claiming that it’s “those other people” who are crazy, not us… is just adding to our pile of convenient blame targets.)
or “the 1%.”
one of these things
is not like the others
alla these crazy people thinkin people with wealth and powerful responsible for things
just cause they have all that like
wealth
and you know
power
literally JUST LIKE ranting about the ‘islamists’ threatening America from caves four thousand miles away
Textbook case. 60 years ago, across the atlantic, mousy here would have been blaming “der Juden.”.
Note also the multiple-post of ideological desperation.
Okay, comparing Occupy Wall Street with the genocide of the Jews in WWII…
You are going to have to shut up right now, or I am throwing you in the ban pile. The only reason you’re not banned already is you’re a regular poster here. And maybe this once you made a mistake.
Don’t make that mistake again.
Ok, first time poster here. Like everyone, I guess, long time reader, and, you know what, Mr. Willis? I know you probably won’t care, but what you have just done… It was the right thing. Just thought I’d let you know, for what it’s worth
I think they might be afraid he’ll STOP being an artist if he gets meds…
Man you make Mills looks so cute in these strips. :3
I don’t get it. What does this have to do with Occupy Wall Street?
I loooooooooooove DK2 and no propaganda comic is going to make me change my mind, even if such propaganda comes from Miller itself