Shortpacked! by David Willis

Toys are serious business.
RSS
‹
›
  • Home
  • About
  • Archive
    • by Calendar
  • Cast
  • Store
  • Tumblr
  • DeviantArt
Robin DeSanto in “Yus, We Can’t”
First First in Chapter Previous Archives Random 82Comments Share Next Latest
Reddit Digg Facebook MySpace Delicious Stumbleupon Buzz Up! Mixx Technorati Google Bookmarks Yahoo Bookmarks Yahoo MyWeb Windows Live Propeller FriendFeed Newsvine Xanga LinkedIn Blinklist Twitter
‹‹ First
‹ Previous
Next ›
Last ››

Robin DeSanto in “Yus, We Can’t”

by David Willis on November 19, 2012 at 12:01 am
  • 06 - Girthday

└ Tags: hostess, jacob, robin desanto, sydney yus, twinkies

Discussion (82) ¬

[ Comments RSS ]
  1. Eposi
    Eposi
    November 19, 2012 at 4:54 am | # | Reply

    Kind of surprised me too that Hostess went under, but then again, when was the last time you saw them at a market

    • Chuck
      Chuck
      November 19, 2012 at 7:56 am | # | Reply

      Mostly they were sold in convenience stores (gas stations) around here. But, yeah, it was really hard to find a box in the market. However, Hostess has a lot of infrastructure and name recognition. No doubt they will be purchased at the bankruptcy auction and a new company will make Hostess brand items using the same equipment and a new labor force (probably without union interference). I think unions are a good thing, but the truth is with free trade you have to match the price of goods made in 3rd world sweat shops. If you can’t get a cost savings on shipping, you can’t really pay your employees more than a 3rd world slave worker on a per output basis. That leads to low wages, or in the case of a company joined to a union, a bankruptcy.
      Unless the US returns to protectionist import policies (which is nearly impossible at the moment, and bad for the big wigs bottom lines, so you know it’ll never happen) we’ll just have to wait until the international labor market stabilizes.

      • Deflin
        Deflin
        November 19, 2012 at 9:12 am | # | Reply

        Except it turns out this was all about the bosses playing money games and nothing about the unions at all. There are plenty of businesses out there that manage to turn a profit while employing union workers, but it doesn’t work if the company is run by asshats who can’t think past the short term reality of their own wallets (note that their greed was so insanely out of control that they ended up losing money in the long run). The solution to exploitation is more unionization, not less. Besides, the free market only works if big businesses like this one can still go kaput – otherwise we have oligarchy and stagnation forever.

        • linkman0596
          linkman0596
          November 19, 2012 at 2:20 pm | # | Reply

          or you know, both. where the union wants to be paid more than they’re actually worth while the management is trying to reduce wages and benefits to the workers below a reasonable level, resulting in a game of chicken that it looks like no one won.

          • N0083rP00F
            N0083rP00F
            November 19, 2012 at 4:13 pm | # | Reply

            Oh I remember that one – Knob Hill Farms – A private unlisted company had a dust up with the union trying to dictate the how and whatfor on running the company. It was the first cut-rate warehouse style grocery chain at the time and paid decent if not A&P wages back then. The owner just closed the doors and gave everyone the mandated severance packages and sold everything off. Turn out he made more money building condo’s on just two of the properties [he owned all the land his stores sat on] than the business could have made in a decade. So sometimes playing chicken gets you in the soup.

          • JW
            JW
            November 19, 2012 at 8:58 pm | # | Reply

            Actually, considering that the same year they decided they “had to go out of business”, that the CEOs raised their own salaries 300% (to something like $2.5 million dollars), and considering we’re finding out that they were ALREADY planning to close many of those plants regardless of whether or not the union agreed to their lower pay demands, it’s pretty obvious that instead of fixing any actual problems the company might have had, they saw the weaknesses, and decided to just screw their own company (including workers) over while trying to squeeze it for as much as possible.

            Yeah, no, they didn’t give a crap about the company one way or the other. I do hope that the company gets bought out instead of the factories going to waste, though, especially with all those workers (who, again, were losing their jobs regardless of what they agreed to). :\

      • Kurai Seraphim
        Kurai Seraphim
        November 19, 2012 at 9:47 am | # | Reply

        Alternatively, you could make products that don’t taste like you sprinkled sugar on a sponge and convince the world to pay more than a quarter for them.

      • gwalla
        gwalla
        November 19, 2012 at 11:37 am | # | Reply

        Overseas sweatshops are more of a factor for toys than they are for baked goods.

        Even when the baked goods are about 80% preservatives.

        Hostess has been mismanaged for years. The management raided the coffers by giving themselves huge raises even as the company was preparing for Chapter 11. They then tried to make up the difference with massive pay cuts and the elimination of the employees’ retirement program.

      • tentagil
        tentagil
        November 19, 2012 at 6:26 pm | # | Reply

        Third World Nation labor has zero effect on baked goods. All of Hostess American product is produced in the US, it has to be because despite the concept that Twinkies will last forever, they only actually have a shelf life of a little over a month. Not to mention most of Hostess money at this point came not from snack cakes but from the fact they were the number two bread bakery in the US. The company fell because of a mix of Mismanagement and greed by the executives, and a Union that had no idea how bad off the company was and thus decided to push to hard. So the 12,000 workers not associated with the Bakers Union are just as much out of worker as the 5000 or so bakers who refused to deal, while the executives will walk away with money in the bank.

        • Chuck
          Chuck
          November 19, 2012 at 7:36 pm | # | Reply

          If you look at the big picture and how all costs are interrelated, the I think that you will find that 3rd world labor does indeed depress all wages in the US. (Well, all wages except corporate executives…)

          But I wasn’t making a statement about Hostess in particular, but the effects of free trade in general.

    • Dragonpriest
      Dragonpriest
      November 21, 2012 at 2:52 am | # | Reply

      Well in this day an age, reguardless of who’s at fault at Hostess, Unions in general have outlived their usefulness. Now IMO, they are more of a nusicense than anything.

      • Riotllama
        Riotllama
        November 26, 2012 at 8:42 am | # | Reply

        and you are an idiot.

      • Tustin2121
        Tustin2121
        November 28, 2012 at 9:02 am | # | Reply

        And you are right. In this day of government regulation, minimum wage, people paying decent wages and stuff, we hardly need unions anymore. They more often than not cause more damage than they help. Plus ones like the SEIU are run like a mafia…

        • dcmeserve
          dcmeserve
          March 16, 2013 at 6:00 pm | # | Reply

          Spoken like a true Fox News watcher.

  2. efloWlivE
    efloWlivE
    November 19, 2012 at 4:54 am | # | Reply

    Well that just makes me sad.

  3. Mrelegos
    Mrelegos
    November 19, 2012 at 4:54 am | # | Reply

    That sounds like a perfectly reasonable reaction.

    …okay, now somebody in the know needs to level with the Brit-Boy. Are Twinkies really made with Beef Fat?

    • Eposi
      Eposi
      November 19, 2012 at 5:00 am | # | Reply

      The glory of most America food is, we don’t ask what is in it till the thousandth case of illness or/and death

    • jimbotherisenclown
      jimbotherisenclown
      November 19, 2012 at 6:30 am | # | Reply

      Yup. Beef fat was one of the many possible shortenings you could potentially find in a twinkie. You’d be surprised at how many baked goods have animal fat in them.

    • Compulsive Collector
      Compulsive Collector
      November 19, 2012 at 9:49 am | # | Reply

      Absolutely. So do Ding Dongs, Ho Hos, Zingers, and every other repulsively nasty snack cake product manufactured by Hostess.

    • mystere9
      mystere9
      November 19, 2012 at 10:33 am | # | Reply

      Based on the sickening, greasy feel a twinkie had to it:not much. Mostly just hydrogenated soybean, cottonseed, and canola oil. Ick!

  4. jnzooger
    jnzooger
    November 19, 2012 at 4:59 am | # | Reply

    Don’t worry, there are still the store brand knockoffs and the Lil Debbies version. And Canada will still be making them cause they aren’t affected.

    • Tucker
      Tucker
      November 19, 2012 at 5:03 am | # | Reply

      Canada won’t be affected? I didn’t know the population here warranted an entirely separate Hostess operation that wasn’t financially entwined with the US’s version.

      • gangler
        gangler
        November 19, 2012 at 5:48 am | # | Reply

        This is the first I’ve heard of it too. If that’s accurate then I’m ecstatic and have some people who will need to know about this.

        • Spazman
          Spazman
          November 19, 2012 at 6:07 am | # | Reply

          if that’s true, I can run a couple hours north for a Twinkies run.

          SWEET.

      • jnzooger
        jnzooger
        November 19, 2012 at 6:37 am | # | Reply

        There is a different parent company that distributes Twinkies up there.

      • Syndaryl
        Syndaryl
        November 19, 2012 at 9:06 am | # | Reply

        I think it was more “Needed to be a Canadian company to dodge taxes” sort of thing, but we do like our garbage food, we do.

        They’re in direct competition with Vachon near where I am though, so it will be interesting to see if the Canadian branch goes under next.

        • Historyman68
          Historyman68
          November 19, 2012 at 11:21 am | # | Reply

          I read that as “direct competition with the Vatican”

          • Plasma Mongoose
            Plasma Mongoose
            November 19, 2012 at 1:42 pm | # | Reply

            I can imagine the slogan for the Vatican Bars, “Jesus Christ, now with more chocolatty flavour”.

            • Roborat
              Roborat
              November 20, 2012 at 3:17 pm | # | Reply

              How about: “Jesus Christ! How many calories are in this thing?”

        • Grazzt
          Grazzt
          November 19, 2012 at 11:58 am | # | Reply

          Actually, both Vachon and the licensed Hostess products are run by a company called Saputo. So it’s like a cupcake-opoly.

          • N0083rP00F
            N0083rP00F
            November 19, 2012 at 4:17 pm | # | Reply

            And Saputo was in the news a while back for financial shenanigans in the dairy part of the business.

            • Jeff K!
              Jeff K!
              November 20, 2012 at 9:25 pm | # | Reply

              They really milked it for all it was worth.

  5. Jamie B
    Jamie B
    November 19, 2012 at 5:32 am | # | Reply

    Am I the only one who thought Robin was fighting Lucy at first glance? Just me? :-)

    • Jason Canty
      Jason Canty
      November 19, 2012 at 7:47 am | # | Reply

      for a split sec I did too. Why is yus STILL in her old Shortpacked outfit. XD Girl is deranged. Shes making way more money doing nothing as a rep. I guess its one of those “my honor was tarnished” things.

      • Platonix
        Platonix
        November 20, 2012 at 8:25 pm | # | Reply

        I prefer the explanation that Sydney is honestly just too one-dimensional to deserve the creativity of a costume change, no matter the situation.

    • maarvarq
      maarvarq
      November 19, 2012 at 8:11 am | # | Reply

      No, I briefly wondered why she was fighting Lucy too.

    • Jessie
      Jessie
      November 19, 2012 at 11:38 am | # | Reply

      When Lucy first came on, my first thought was “WATCH OUT! IT’S SYDNEY IN DISGUISE! IT’S A TRAP!!!”

      Their noses are different enough that I’m almost totally convinced that I was wrong.

      • Plasma Mongoose
        Plasma Mongoose
        November 19, 2012 at 1:47 pm | # | Reply

        Two words: Latex Perfection.

    • gwalla
      gwalla
      November 19, 2012 at 11:42 am | # | Reply

      Have you ever seen Lucy and Sidney in the same place at the same time?

      DUN DUN DUNNN

  6. Dr. Z
    Dr. Z
    November 19, 2012 at 5:33 am | # | Reply

    It’s sad that the teamster union worked with Hostess to keep the company afloat, but the bakers union wouldn’t cooperate.

    19,000 employees. God.

    • Jason Canty
      Jason Canty
      November 19, 2012 at 7:49 am | # | Reply

      This is true. But it also looks like the Hedge fund that owned the company was running it like their personal piggy bank giving managment raises. If this is true also.. So much angerrrr!

    • Valdrax
      Valdrax
      November 19, 2012 at 9:36 am | # | Reply

      Hostess has been on the decline since 2003 due to terrible management. They’ve had six CEOs in 10 years, they’ve closed dozens of plants, and they previously demanded over $100 million in wage and pension cuts (which the unions gave them and which was not reinvested in the company), and instead the company’s debt load has continued to climb until they declared bankruptcy a second time in 8 years. Meanwhile, executive pay had increased, and they looted the employee-funded pension contributions in 2011 claiming that they were just “borrowing” it.

      The offer the union turned down? An 8% initial pay cut that over 5 years would grow to a 27% cut, the company permanently keeps the employee’s pension contributions and no new employees will be able to get into a pension, and higher insurance rates and poorer benefits. Employees would end up paid about half what they were getting paid before the first round of cuts in 2005.

      The unions were scapegoated in the destruction of a classic American company by two vulture capital firms that specialize in picking up “distressed debt” and then pillaging what capital they can before chucking the rest.

    • Compulsive Collector
      Compulsive Collector
      November 19, 2012 at 9:37 am | # | Reply

      Yeah, it’s all those greedy hourly employees’ fault. How selfish of the evil laborers to not accept 8% pay cuts and 32% benefits reductions to fund a 300% raise for the CEO and 60%-100% increases given to other executives while the company was in the middle of filing for bankruptcy. Who do they think they are?

      • Dr. Z
        Dr. Z
        November 19, 2012 at 4:22 pm | # | Reply

        Laid off.

  7. Dr. Z
    Dr. Z
    November 19, 2012 at 7:06 am | # | Reply

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Twinkes-Chocolate-Cream-Going-Out-Of-Business-Last-Boxes-Left-/290816912514?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item43b609ec82

    Chocolate filed Twinkies.

    $1,000.00 starting bid.

    $3,000.00 Buy It Now price.

    Free Shipping!

    • begbert2
      begbert2
      November 19, 2012 at 10:49 am | # | Reply

      Free shipping?? Where do I sign up!

      • Valdrax
        Valdrax
        November 19, 2012 at 5:42 pm | # | Reply

        Fanfiction.net?

  8. Dicrel Seijin
    Dicrel Seijin
    November 19, 2012 at 7:14 am | # | Reply

    Ah, this brings back memories. As a kid, I didn’t turning the page of my comic book to find an ad, but the Hostess ones at least tried with heroes and villains squaring off. Resolution by Twinkies rather than combat was always a little odd though.

  9. Brilliantly Aphotic
    Brilliantly Aphotic
    November 19, 2012 at 7:34 am | # | Reply

    My english teacher spent half a class talking about this. He prefaced the news with “A sad day in America, a sad day in the world”

  10. Doctor_Who
    Doctor_Who
    November 19, 2012 at 8:20 am | # | Reply

    I thought Twinkies were supposed to be the one food that survives the apocalypse! Apocalypse isn’t due for another month…

    Tallahassee will be devastated.

    • Yotomoe
      Yotomoe
      November 19, 2012 at 9:43 am | # | Reply

      Everything’s falling into place…guess we’re eating cockroaches.

      • Doctor_Who
        Doctor_Who
        November 19, 2012 at 10:34 am | # | Reply

        According to Wall-E, cockroaches of the future live on Twinkies. No Twinkies, no roaches. We will starve!

        Although if we had access to Twinkies, we’d probably eat those instead.

        Or both. Gotta get protein somehow.

  11. Vesper2112
    Vesper2112
    November 19, 2012 at 8:32 am | # | Reply

    (applauds) When the Hostess thing went down, I mentioned to my fiancee that I have fond memories of the Hostess/Marvel ads in old comics and I got a blank stare back… I’M NOT THAT OLD! It happened!

  12. ArkhamTexan
    ArkhamTexan
    November 19, 2012 at 9:47 am | # | Reply

    Oh, god, has anybody checked on Seanbaby yet?!

  13. Yotomoe
    Yotomoe
    November 19, 2012 at 9:54 am | # | Reply

    Sydney Yus really DOES have a weakness for twinkies if she’s asking Robin to buy an $80 box.

  14. palaeoemrus
    palaeoemrus
    November 19, 2012 at 10:04 am | # | Reply

    Bimbo makes Twinkies (and Zingers, formerly of Dollie Madison) under a license in certain regions, BlueBird, Little debbie, and others all make creme filled sponge cake ‘Twinkie’ clones. Twinkies are just like fried pies (with fruit, pudding or nut and syrup fillings), brownies, ‘rice krispy’ marshmallow treat bars, smores, bear claws, frosted filled snack cakes, strudels, pop-tarts, cupcakes, ‘snowballs’, moon pies (gross!), cinnamon rolls, vanilla wafers, chcolate chip cookies, honey buns, etc. in that any exclusive competitive advantage was lost long ago and multiple alternatives exist for the consumer to explore at a variety of prices.

    Except for the 18.5 K people that lost their jobs and company that will try to sell of its brand names to competitors, and the unions, union members, and companies who will make lawyers rich trying to sue each other, and he investors who are backing out and the lenders who are probably taking a small haircut instead of a huge one down the road, this is a non issue.

    • Michelle J Caboose
      Michelle J Caboose
      December 17, 2012 at 10:37 am | # | Reply

      Actually, Twinkies were not pies. Yes, Hostess made several varieties of single-serving pies; however, Twinkies were sponge cake with a creme filling.

  15. echo
    echo
    November 19, 2012 at 11:43 am | # | Reply

    Thank you so much! Loved this comic, brought back so many memories of the Hostess ads in comics! Good stuff!

  16. Reepicheep-chan
    Reepicheep-chan
    November 19, 2012 at 11:56 am | # | Reply

    True confessions time: I never liked Hostess snacks of any kind or any of te knock-offs. Even as a sugar-junkie child.

    • OverlordMikey
      OverlordMikey
      November 19, 2012 at 12:46 pm | # | Reply

      I know I’ve never liked most of their snacks, that includes the beloved Twinkie… -_-

      • Melvin Schlock
        Melvin Schlock
        November 19, 2012 at 4:45 pm | # | Reply

        In Australia, Twinkies were only available in speciality import stores. I tried them once for the novelty value and regretted it instantly. I have an enormous sweet tooth, but Twinkies made the enamel on my teeth crackle.

  17. Iliana
    Iliana
    November 19, 2012 at 12:37 pm | # | Reply

    Shortpacked employees should try unionising. That could be a hilarious storyline.

  18. hinoteoni
    hinoteoni
    November 19, 2012 at 3:08 pm | # | Reply

    I love this man

  19. AdamYJ
    AdamYJ
    November 19, 2012 at 3:21 pm | # | Reply

    This news has been all over the internet and someone finally riffs on the old Hostess superhero ads.

    Snack cakes and comic books. The ultimate fusion of junk food and junk culture.

  20. John Harmon
    John Harmon
    November 19, 2012 at 4:03 pm | # | Reply

    Oh man, I love the printing dots effect on this! And the page is yellowed too. This is all kinds of fantastic.

  21. Wack'd
    Wack'd
    November 19, 2012 at 4:48 pm | # | Reply

    I would love to know how the hell you got this page to look so authentic.

  22. @AndreT_NY
    @AndreT_NY
    November 19, 2012 at 4:54 pm | # | Reply

    This just in…..
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/twinkies_staves_off_extinction_judge_k9sgG26pNuCBpufJZPMZ6L?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost

  23. Stephen Bierce
    Stephen Bierce
    November 19, 2012 at 6:08 pm | # | Reply

    NEWSFLASH: The judge at bankruptcy court ordered the Hostess management to go back to mediation with the striking workers and refused their request to dissolve the company.

    Patriotism prevails.

  24. Stephen Bierce
    Stephen Bierce
    November 19, 2012 at 6:32 pm | # | Reply

    BTW, over the weekend somebody posted a link to a reverse-engineered public domain Twinkie recipie and I proposed to my sister (who’s a pro pastry chef) that she make some. Her response:

    No. I will not bake that. Not for love, nor for money. Not for kin, nor for country. Not for all the tea in China. Not even if Martha [Stewart] asked me. Not even if a zombiefied Julia [Child] offered to not eat my brains if I baked one pan. Never is a long long time, and I will not live to see it. However, NEVEH!

    I told her how proud I am of her after that.

    • AdamYJ
      AdamYJ
      November 19, 2012 at 8:57 pm | # | Reply

      Why is she so against it? Because twinkies are lowest-common-denominator junk food and she can make better stuff? Or out of some sort of respect for a brand that’s going under?

      • Stephen Bierce
        Stephen Bierce
        November 19, 2012 at 11:15 pm | # | Reply

        She’s Lynnora Bierce. Enough explanation for me.

        • CWR
          CWR
          November 20, 2012 at 6:38 am | # | Reply

          In the future you may want to avoid combining the words proposed, I, sister, my, and to in the order you did there. Whilst speed scanning the page that tidbit just seared into my forebrain.

          I guess that’s really my problem, come to think about it.

          • Roborat
            Roborat
            November 20, 2012 at 3:22 pm | # | Reply

            It wasn’t just you, that was the first part of his post that I processed, I had to read carefully from the beginning to get my brain sorted out.

            • CWR
              CWR
              November 20, 2012 at 7:32 pm | # | Reply

              It may have been the placement of the parenthesised insert that draws the eye and separates the phrase in the least appropriate manner.

              • Stephen Bierce
                Stephen Bierce
                November 21, 2012 at 5:53 pm | # | Reply

                Either way, it’s evident that I have lived in Tennessee far too long for anybody’s good.

  25. palaeoemrus
    palaeoemrus
    November 19, 2012 at 6:59 pm | # | Reply

    Gee Sponge cake shaped like a corn bread loaf with some cream in the middle. I’m sure NASA and MIT learned a whole lot from whoever unraveled THAT ineffable riddle… The hard part is probably getting them to wear a hat and smile while twirling a lariat though.

  26. Romanticide
    Romanticide
    November 20, 2012 at 12:37 am | # | Reply

    I heard Bimbo is interested in buying the brand, I wouldn’t be surprised they are quite a big corporation and they could probably use another product to compete with submarinos over here and on the USA they could use a product like Twinkie to get bigger there.

  27. GeekRyuu
    GeekRyuu
    November 20, 2012 at 1:49 am | # | Reply

    This is a thing of beauty, sir. I salute you.

  28. Uniqueantique
    Uniqueantique
    November 20, 2012 at 2:05 am | # | Reply

    Beautiful! Grats. DW

  29. Captain_Cadaver
    Captain_Cadaver
    November 22, 2012 at 8:51 pm | # | Reply

    Reference to the old Hostess comic-style comic ads (in the 70s???) Nice.

  30. K.a.
    K.a.
    November 25, 2012 at 12:24 pm | # | Reply

    Dont worry theyll reciprocate.

  31. Dreadjaws
    Dreadjaws
    December 12, 2012 at 9:37 pm | # | Reply

    So, I guess Zombieland is not based on a true story after all.

Comment ¬
Cancel reply

NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Convention appearances:

Calgary Expo Calgary, AB: April 26-28
Phoenix Comicon Phoenix, AZ: May 23-26, 2013
BotCon San Diego, CA: June 28-30
San Diego Comic-Con San Diego, CA: July 18-21
SPX Bethesda, MD: September 14-15

Roomies! It's Walky! Joyce and Walky!
Multiplex
Sorcery 101
Templar, AZ

The Transformers Wiki

Hail to the Slash

80 page GIANT
Axe Cop
The Book of Biff
Butt-Taco
Comics Curmudgeon
College Roomies from Hell!!!
Diesel Sweeties
Dinosaur Comics
Dr. McNinja
Dresden Codak
Fans!
Fleen
Gastrophobia
Girl Genius
Girls with Slingshots
Goats
Hark, a vagrant
Hijinks Ensue
Intrepid Girlbot
Legend of Bill
Medium Large
Not Invented Here
Octopus Pie
Overcompensating
Penny Arcade
PhDcomics
Power Nap
Questionable Content
Real Life
Rob and Elliot
Bad Machinery
Schlock Mercenary
Sheldon
So Far Apart
Something Positive
Two Lumps
Wapsi Square
Wonderella
Wondermark

Frumph.NET

Tags

amber animated batman botcon conquest conventions dark of the moon david willis dinobot drew duncan ethan faz galasso generations gijoe guest strip hamsters homosexuality jacob jesus joe justice league ken leslie malaya megatron merch mike ninja rick nipple optimus prime politics religion robin desanto ronald reagan roz sdcc sg ravage shattered glass star wars tni strips transformers transformers prime ultra car

©2005-2013 David Willis | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑