<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pin-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/</link>
	<description>Toys are serious business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creaks</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83609</link>
		<dc:creator>Creaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83609</guid>
		<description>Hes displaying sexified depictions of men as if they were slabs of meat on wholesale?

I am so ANGRY!!! Im... Hang on i have to check something.

hmmm.... Uh huh.....anything.....

Well, okay, Im just angry this time not aroused.

THATS SO SEXIST!!! Damn you Willis you equal oppurtunity sex monster!!! 



On the side, sexism IS a genderless term, so just because its not a prejudice against the FEMALE gender, or stereotypes, or gender roles, doesnt mean its not sexism. So, say, equal representations, depicting/reinforcing gender roles or stereotypes would still be sexist. But its the context of the situation thats key. Like Willis for example, its all good natured fun. And you dont have to look hard to find his ACTUAL stance on sexism, in fact like three comics past this one for example.

So calling Willis sexist over something like this is, well, it really shouldnt be taken seriously. 

huh... Why do I feel like the scene around me should be fading black while a star followed by a rainbow shoots over my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hes displaying sexified depictions of men as if they were slabs of meat on wholesale?</p>
<p>I am so ANGRY!!! Im&#8230; Hang on i have to check something.</p>
<p>hmmm&#8230;. Uh huh&#8230;..anything&#8230;..</p>
<p>Well, okay, Im just angry this time not aroused.</p>
<p>THATS SO SEXIST!!! Damn you Willis you equal oppurtunity sex monster!!! </p>
<p>On the side, sexism IS a genderless term, so just because its not a prejudice against the FEMALE gender, or stereotypes, or gender roles, doesnt mean its not sexism. So, say, equal representations, depicting/reinforcing gender roles or stereotypes would still be sexist. But its the context of the situation thats key. Like Willis for example, its all good natured fun. And you dont have to look hard to find his ACTUAL stance on sexism, in fact like three comics past this one for example.</p>
<p>So calling Willis sexist over something like this is, well, it really shouldnt be taken seriously. </p>
<p>huh&#8230; Why do I feel like the scene around me should be fading black while a star followed by a rainbow shoots over my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthkerzy</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83393</link>
		<dc:creator>darthkerzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83393</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s got pinups for dudes too. It&#039;s right there in the description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s got pinups for dudes too. It&#8217;s right there in the description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creaks</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83062</link>
		<dc:creator>Creaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-83062</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.... Well lets see what shortpack has today.

Heres two hot naked lesbians, barely covering their naughty bits.

I can clearly see the underboob of leslies pert rack under her sign.

Its like, their hotness is being USED for.... STUFF!

This... THIS....IS...SEXIST!!!!

I AM AROUSED!
....
.........
With anger! Aroused with ANGER!!!!!!! I am outraged! For shame Willis! How could you be so sexist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. Well lets see what shortpack has today.</p>
<p>Heres two hot naked lesbians, barely covering their naughty bits.</p>
<p>I can clearly see the underboob of leslies pert rack under her sign.</p>
<p>Its like, their hotness is being USED for&#8230;. STUFF!</p>
<p>This&#8230; THIS&#8230;.IS&#8230;SEXIST!!!!</p>
<p>I AM AROUSED!<br />
&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
With anger! Aroused with ANGER!!!!!!! I am outraged! For shame Willis! How could you be so sexist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tahrey</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81993</link>
		<dc:creator>tahrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81993</guid>
		<description>The system randomly messed up and put this as the &quot;cliffhanger&quot; instead of the god-offending comic?

Surely it&#039;s a sign. A sign that the almighty is totes in favour of gay marriage, and wishes to distance itself from all the homophobia in that book which claims so much false connection with it.

Also, it&#039;s quite fond of naked lesbians. But you didn&#039;t hear that from me.

(Or, I guess it could just be a freudian slip on your behalf ... but the mistake being difficult to correct? ALSO A SIGN)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The system randomly messed up and put this as the &#8220;cliffhanger&#8221; instead of the god-offending comic?</p>
<p>Surely it&#8217;s a sign. A sign that the almighty is totes in favour of gay marriage, and wishes to distance itself from all the homophobia in that book which claims so much false connection with it.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s quite fond of naked lesbians. But you didn&#8217;t hear that from me.</p>
<p>(Or, I guess it could just be a freudian slip on your behalf &#8230; but the mistake being difficult to correct? ALSO A SIGN)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romanticide</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81965</link>
		<dc:creator>Romanticide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81965</guid>
		<description>A photoshoot for old times? XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A photoshoot for old times? XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dempsy</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81917</link>
		<dc:creator>Dempsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81917</guid>
		<description>I think this is the most sexualized we&#039;ve ever seen Leslie.  I approve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the most sexualized we&#8217;ve ever seen Leslie.  I approve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuckyStar7</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81877</link>
		<dc:creator>LuckyStar7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81877</guid>
		<description>I read your comment in Pinkie Pie&#039;s voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your comment in Pinkie Pie&#8217;s voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macker</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81874</link>
		<dc:creator>Macker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81874</guid>
		<description>Does Les and Robin know the special M*A*S*H Cheer? Something about a certain technique being Divine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Les and Robin know the special M*A*S*H Cheer? Something about a certain technique being Divine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimfromtx</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81867</link>
		<dc:creator>jimfromtx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81867</guid>
		<description>Normally, I do check my comics at work...good thing I caught up here at home o.o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, I do check my comics at work&#8230;good thing I caught up here at home o.o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heavyoak</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81865</link>
		<dc:creator>Heavyoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shortpacked.com/2012/comic/book-14/03-totally-babies/pinup/#comment-81865</guid>
		<description>something tells me he went to rule 34 and got his ideas from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something tells me he went to rule 34 and got his ideas from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
