Hey, guess what? As I was uploading the Tumblr comic I had prepared for Monday’s update, I realized I had misdated my McGee & Me comic for Thursday instead of Friday. And Jesus Christ is it annoying to move comics around on ComicPress. You gotta delete not only the post itself, but remove variously-sized images from several different directories via FTP, and then reupload and start all over again. And I just don’t have the time for that right now. Well, I probably do, but I just don’t wanna do it. And so, uh, whoops, have filler for my filler. I just wanted something new up Friday!
(Insert obligatory Joel Watson namedrop here for stealing his SDCC banner, blah blah blah.)
Yeah, it’s nakedness, but I realized it’s no more nakedness than you’ve seen on here previously, so I figgered what the hell. I did a Pin-Up Week on Tumblr (along with Starline and Randy) and this was my lone Shortpacked! entry. The rest were all Dumbing of Age themed, and you can find them all here on my Deviant Art account.
And now this can stare at you all weekend long, instead of McGee, as God intended.
Hmm, I don’t think they’re quite naked enough…
Once again girl on girl action and it’s wasted on me.
Yyyyyyyes please.
Giggty
KNIGHTS: (fists strike the tabletop) SMUT WITHOUT WARNING! (fists strike tabletop) SMUT WITHOUT WARNING! (fists strike tabletop) SMUT WITHOUT WARNING!
* * *
Next Week: Is Donna’s generation the last that will get to play with physical toys? Is Shortpacked! becoming OBSOLETE?
Nonsense!
That happened when the Internet causes a resurgence in mail orders and made the entire physical-store model useless.
It’s comics like these that make being asexual really suck.
Don’t worry it’s wasted on me too, for different reasons.
But in this moment we can be brothers in lack of interest.
Also: God help anyone who checks this comic at work. We’re all pulling for you.
But not like that. Ew.
Normally, I do check my comics at work…good thing I caught up here at home o.o
I don’t mind seeing this again. I don’t mind seeing this ever.
Looking at this delicious art, I can’t figure out what exactly prop 469 is.
It was a proposed law that would get these two to make out.
Also something about cancer, I dunno.
Also Ethan and some guy named Thad, too. It was an equal-opportunity licky-style-makeout-maker, Prop. 469.
Let us all give a cheer for fanservice! It’s how the bill would want to be remembered.
Stop teasing us with this AFTER they broke up. ;_;
That said, this is pretty damn good fanservice.
Why, hello there, attractive, naked women! And don’t you both look lovely?
I read your comment in Pinkie Pie’s voice.
It seems that you’re one step closer to the cure for butts disease! Bravo, that man.
I’ll be in my room, if anyone needs me.
Glad I didn’t check out today’s comic from work. Kinda think you might have done better in just leaving linkage.
Bless you Willis, you make this world a better place.
I’m not, ya know, a perv or something but you know, Willis, this IS the internet. You don’t really have to censor your art. In the Federalist Papers, James Madison discusses the Constitutional right to dirty cartoons.
It wouldn’t be very nice to his readers for whom the phrase “not safe for work” has actual meaning.
The Ethan one wasn’t Shortpacked themed?
He’s Dumbing of Age Ethan. No graying hair.
I didn’t get it. Because of where Leslie’s finger was I read it as “DROP 469,” which I assumed was Willis’ booth # at Comic-con.
I had to read the comments to find out what the filler was referring to.
Whelp… they’ve got MY vote.
Well got my comics got my pin ups… life is good
something tells me he went to rule 34 and got his ideas from there.
Does Les and Robin know the special M*A*S*H Cheer? Something about a certain technique being Divine!
I think this is the most sexualized we’ve ever seen Leslie. I approve.
A photoshoot for old times? XD
The system randomly messed up and put this as the “cliffhanger” instead of the god-offending comic?
Surely it’s a sign. A sign that the almighty is totes in favour of gay marriage, and wishes to distance itself from all the homophobia in that book which claims so much false connection with it.
Also, it’s quite fond of naked lesbians. But you didn’t hear that from me.
(Or, I guess it could just be a freudian slip on your behalf … but the mistake being difficult to correct? ALSO A SIGN)
Hmmm…. Well lets see what shortpack has today.
Heres two hot naked lesbians, barely covering their naughty bits.
I can clearly see the underboob of leslies pert rack under her sign.
Its like, their hotness is being USED for…. STUFF!
This… THIS….IS…SEXIST!!!!
I AM AROUSED!
….
………
With anger! Aroused with ANGER!!!!!!! I am outraged! For shame Willis! How could you be so sexist?
he’s got pinups for dudes too. It’s right there in the description.
Hes displaying sexified depictions of men as if they were slabs of meat on wholesale?
I am so ANGRY!!! Im… Hang on i have to check something.
hmmm…. Uh huh…..anything…..
Well, okay, Im just angry this time not aroused.
THATS SO SEXIST!!! Damn you Willis you equal oppurtunity sex monster!!!
On the side, sexism IS a genderless term, so just because its not a prejudice against the FEMALE gender, or stereotypes, or gender roles, doesnt mean its not sexism. So, say, equal representations, depicting/reinforcing gender roles or stereotypes would still be sexist. But its the context of the situation thats key. Like Willis for example, its all good natured fun. And you dont have to look hard to find his ACTUAL stance on sexism, in fact like three comics past this one for example.
So calling Willis sexist over something like this is, well, it really shouldnt be taken seriously.
huh… Why do I feel like the scene around me should be fading black while a star followed by a rainbow shoots over my head.