Shortpacked! by David Willis

Discussion (29) ¬

1. 
   David Herbert

   January 6, 2011 at 12:02 am | # | Reply

   I always figured Willis would be on the bottom for some reason.

   • 
     fit-to-freak

     January 6, 2011 at 12:04 am | # | Reply

     You know, I never conciously thought about it, but i kinda assumed that too.

     • 
       Cassidy

       January 6, 2011 at 12:56 am | # | Reply

       HE GETS REALLY TOUCHEY ABOUT THIS STUFF…. hmmmmmmmmmm *thinks dirty thoughts*
   • 
     John

     January 6, 2011 at 1:09 am | # | Reply

     Same, though the thought didn’t occur to me until I read this very strip…
   • 
     frosgrok

     January 6, 2011 at 4:58 am | # | Reply

     Not that I’ve devoted much thought to the subject of Willis’ preferences…

     I figure most folks do a certain amount of swapping around…

     In among the various folks I’ve been around (hetero couples, groups, bi, gay, and “uhm, dang I dunno what that was”) Some liked poking more than poked, some vice versa, some switched during the same event… Some were doing both at the same time (actually multiple of both).

     I know some folks are “bottoms” and some are “tops” but I suspect that many are just “whatever”. I know of at least 1 gay couple that says anal is just icky…. “Noooo way!” I believe ‘em too, and no I didn’t check…

     Always struck me that 69 was the least potentially damaging of the “let’s both get off on this” for gays…

     Butt, what do I know?

     • 
       frosgrok

       January 14, 2011 at 5:06 am | # | Reply

       This is not to imply that Willis (real person) is accurately portrayed in this strip or my comments. Or not… I have no idea what, whom, or if, he/it has going on in (real) Willis’ reality.

       Not too sure about mine either.

       And, in either case, I don’t really care. Having a cold helps that feeling.
2. 
   Sarah

   January 6, 2011 at 12:16 am | # | Reply

   I can’t believe both they and you missed the obvious “surprise buttsex” line.

   …Speaking of, I’ve always wondered how that’s punctuated. Is “surprise” an adjective, indicating the nature of the buttsex, or is it an exclamation, ie “Surprise! It’s buttsex”?

   • 
     Alechsa

     January 6, 2011 at 12:57 am | # | Reply

     Damn, you beat me to the joke.

     In response to your question: ….Yes.

     I’ve seen/heard it punctuated/emphasized both ways.
   • 
     coobee

     January 6, 2011 at 2:34 am | # | Reply

     I always assumed the former. Now I’m trying to decide which sounds more psychopathic.
   • 
     frosgrok

     January 6, 2011 at 5:10 am | # | Reply

     It’s based on context:

     “surprise buttsex” is an event or activity

     “Surprise! It’s buttsex!” is a line from a SNL mock advertisement.
3. 
   whiteribbit

   January 6, 2011 at 12:17 am | # | Reply

   THAT’S NOT A PICKLE

   • 
     whiteribbit

     January 6, 2011 at 12:41 am | # | Reply

     Now that I think about it, I read Willis’s line in the third panel in the same voice I would for Faz…
4. 
   arjay2813

   January 6, 2011 at 12:37 am | # | Reply

   love the eyes in panel 2. i think surprise buttsex is a way of signaling that its both indicative of the nature and exclamation at the same time

   • 
     Louis

     January 6, 2011 at 11:10 pm | # | Reply

     I just love the dialogue in panel 2. I wish this kind of helpful announcement was made in public places more often.
5. 
   Rowen Morland

   January 6, 2011 at 12:45 am | # | Reply

   I don’t mind laughing at this if you don’t mind posting it.
6. 
   Skipps

   January 6, 2011 at 12:49 am | # | Reply

   That Willis. He comes and he goes.
7. 
   JK9000

   January 6, 2011 at 3:00 am | # | Reply

   I didn’t even notice the poorly drawn penis until the bubblegum line.

   • 
     frosgrok

     January 6, 2011 at 5:05 am | # | Reply

     And just how do you know it’s poorly drawn??!
8. 
   Tenn

   January 6, 2011 at 4:44 am | # | Reply

   Did Willis have his foreskin surgically closed, or is he wearing pink stretchypants?

   …I actually think I prefer the bubblegum explanation, despite the possible implications.

   • 
     Liam

     January 6, 2011 at 11:13 am | # | Reply

     Thanks for pointing that out. Now I can’t unsee it.
9. 
   OldsVistaCruiser

   January 6, 2011 at 6:20 am | # | Reply

   I thought that panel #3 showed a hard-on bulging through some pink underwear. On the other hand, some people like blowing bubble gum!
10. 
    Thenodrin

    January 6, 2011 at 8:21 am | # | Reply

    I just have one question:

    WHAT IS WILLIS DOING TO CHOO-CHOO BEAR?!?!?!?

    That is all.

    Theno

    • 
      Kamino Neko

      January 6, 2011 at 10:07 am | # | Reply

      Oh, Goddess…Singularikitty, nooooo!

      On another note, that’s one impressive package they got him sporting…
11. 
    Jack

    January 6, 2011 at 8:24 am | # | Reply

    I struggle to see how this one is significantly different to the original, really.

    • 
      Rasputin Varez

      January 6, 2011 at 7:42 pm | # | Reply

      the huge dick for a start…
12. 
    Andrew

    January 6, 2011 at 9:02 am | # | Reply

    This one is funnier than the original.
13. 
    sarpiedon

    January 6, 2011 at 9:26 am | # | Reply

    Ya know, I seem to remember this comic from when it was first published, but I sure don’t remember the pink blob that was coming out of Willis’ pants…
14. 
    penguintruth

    January 6, 2011 at 6:24 pm | # | Reply

    Obviously Willis can blow bubblegum like it’s blowing him.
15. 
    Cope

    January 6, 2011 at 11:28 pm | # | Reply

    This one seems like something Willis would have written himself.