Shortpacked! by David Willis

Toys are serious business.
RSS
‹
›
  • Home
  • About
  • Archive
    • by Calendar
  • Cast
  • Store
  • Tumblr
  • DeviantArt
Overhonkied
First First in Chapter Previous Archives Random 140Comments Share Next Latest
Reddit Digg Facebook MySpace Delicious Stumbleupon Buzz Up! Mixx Technorati Google Bookmarks Yahoo Bookmarks Yahoo MyWeb Windows Live Propeller FriendFeed Newsvine Xanga LinkedIn Blinklist Twitter
‹‹ First
‹ Previous
Next ›
Last ››

Overhonkied

by David Willis on October 1, 2010 at 12:01 am
  • 03 - Minorities Report

└ Tags: amber, ethan

Discussion (140) ¬

[ Comments RSS ]
  1. David Herbert
    David Herbert
    October 1, 2010 at 12:04 am | # | Reply

    Maybe Leslie has some Asian heritage?

  2. Jen Aside
    Jen Aside
    October 1, 2010 at 12:13 am | # | Reply

    Weren’t the Jews from a part of Asia??

    Oh, wait. Europe. Ah, screw it, I bet Galasso doesn’t know geography, either.

    • KokiriWolf
      KokiriWolf
      October 1, 2010 at 12:30 am | # | Reply

      Judaism did originate in Asia.

    • No0ne
      No0ne
      October 1, 2010 at 12:36 am | # | Reply

      Middle East good sir, between Europe and Asia.

      • Trae Dorn
        Trae Dorn
        October 1, 2010 at 1:13 am | # | Reply

        And parts of Northern Africa.

        But the part that Judaism originated from is in Asia. :P

      • Old_Crow
        Old_Crow
        October 1, 2010 at 3:32 am | # | Reply

        No0ne, there are seven continents on the planet and “the middle east” is not one of them. That region resides in Asia, making it “Asian.”

        • No0ne
          No0ne
          October 2, 2010 at 12:16 pm | # | Reply

          Go get an Atlas, Israel is located in the section under Middle East.

          CIA World Fact Book Says so too.

          Don’t argue with the CIA man, they will kidnap you and 3 years later people will find your naked corpse in Tibet.

          • Trae Dorn
            Trae Dorn
            October 3, 2010 at 8:10 pm | # | Reply

            A region and a continent are not the same thing :P

          • Tetsukalian
            Tetsukalian
            October 11, 2010 at 6:09 pm | # | Reply

            The Theory of Evolution is true. You have but to look in nature, present day, to see this. Human beings are primates, we are members of the lines of great apes. If you don’t believe the theory, at least believe what your eyes tell you when you compare apes and humans. As for the Native Americans, and other natives in the Americas, I am not sure where they originated exactly, but they are thought to have come across the Bearing Straits, from Asia and Asia Minor/Russian area. I think

          • Tetsukalian
            Tetsukalian
            October 11, 2010 at 6:13 pm | # | Reply

            Sorry I replied up here, i was replying to your post on evolution, which is a couple posts down, and i accidently replied here. Then again, there was no reply thing by your name in the comment i was responding to.

      • LockeZ
        LockeZ
        October 2, 2010 at 3:16 am | # | Reply

        We’re talking about ethnicity, not continents. He’s white.

        • Old_Crow
          Old_Crow
          October 2, 2010 at 4:05 am | # | Reply

          No. If you use the term “Asian” you are NOT talking about ethnicity. You are specifically referring to that which resides in, or is exported from the … wait for it … CONTINENT of Asia.

          • No0ne
            No0ne
            October 2, 2010 at 12:21 pm | # | Reply

            But, then couldn’t people who prescribe to the theory of evolution make the argument that we are all Asians? Or from where ever they say we evolved from, I can’t keep track it changes on what seems to be a weekly basis…

            I say people who prescribe because I do not.

          • dorp
            dorp
            October 4, 2010 at 1:41 am | # | Reply

            You should probably learn a bit more about the theory then because at no point have we been said to originate in Asia. At heart we’re all Africans.

          • David Willis
            David Willis
            October 4, 2010 at 1:51 am | # | Reply

            The believed location where the human race has been birthed certainly hasn’t changed from Africa in a number of decades. I wonder exactly where you get your information from, if not just the strawman in your mind.

          • No0ne
            No0ne
            October 4, 2010 at 10:49 pm | # | Reply

            Web comics are where I get my information from! No, not really…

            And I wrote last year a paper on how early man got to the Americas, the people who wrote the various books and magazine articles (Some written even in 2008) I read had way too many theories on how the Native Americans got there. Some said that Cro-Magnon evolved in Europe separately and fought the Neanderthal who had evolved in Africa. Then the surviving Neanderthal traveled across the sea in wooden rafts and became the Native Americans. Another said that The Neanderthals came from Mongolia but didn’t bury their dead until they reached Africa and even bones don’t tend to last long when they sit on the surface exposed to the elements. So you can see on how I became confused on where the accepted evolution point for man is.

            Of course my favorite one is that we evolved on Atlantis and when it sank half of the human race went east to South America and the other half ended up in Africa, or the theory about the Aztecs being the lost tribes of Israel who carried the Ark of the Covenant across the land bridge between North America and Russia and settled in South America.

            The other hilarious theory is that the Mohave Desert was really the Garden of Eden and God turned it into a waste land after he kicked Adam and Eve out. I think the guy who wrote that one either has never visited the Mohave or he forgot about the whole Angel with a flaming sword stopping people from entering the garden thing. Or maybe the Angel got bored and left…

          • No0ne
            No0ne
            October 4, 2010 at 10:52 pm | # | Reply

            Err expect for instead of east they went west… stupid lack of edit button…

          • LiamKav
            LiamKav
            October 5, 2010 at 6:45 am | # | Reply

            I was going to point out that Neanderthal man was from Europe, not Africa, and therefore question your research, but then I saw that, while writing a paper on the early migration of man, and you did research on The Garden of Eden and Atlantis?

            I am scared to ask what school this is, and what crazy-ass library you were using.

  3. Viktor
    Viktor
    October 1, 2010 at 12:19 am | # | Reply

    I don’t see why they’d embrace it. Firing people because they’re white and hiring because they’re asian is just as much discrimination as the opposite.

    • BlueNight
      BlueNight
      October 1, 2010 at 12:44 am | # | Reply

      You, of course, do not have Galasso’s tunnel vision.

      Also, is Ultra-car a honkey? The pun immediately suggested itself to me.

    • AndyL
      AndyL
      October 1, 2010 at 2:21 am | # | Reply

      Unless you believed that there was an intentional bias in the original hiring. Then some sort of affirmative action might at least make sense. (Even then, it’d still be pointless unless Shortpacked was a major economic force in the community.)

      But there doesn’t seem to be much bias in Shortpacked’s hiring policy. They seem to just hire anyone who comes in the door.

    • Galvy~
      Galvy~
      October 1, 2010 at 4:50 am | # | Reply

      To answer your question. yes it’s just as much discrimination to higher someone based on race as to not hire them based on race.

      • Viktor
        Viktor
        October 1, 2010 at 12:19 pm | # | Reply

        I know that, what I don’t get is why Ethan is considering not fighting it.

        • hatgirlstargazer
          hatgirlstargazer
          October 1, 2010 at 4:12 pm | # | Reply

          Because sometimes liberal guilt is irrational.

  4. Zolrak 22
    Zolrak 22
    October 1, 2010 at 12:20 am | # | Reply

    They could try saying amber is asian since she could be related to Faz, Galasso could buy that xD

  5. Naelu
    Naelu
    October 1, 2010 at 12:28 am | # | Reply

    OR, they could just reveal that Faz is only half asian, have him fired and hire another asian instead. One that’s not Korean, just to err on the side of caution. >_>

    • No0ne
      No0ne
      October 1, 2010 at 12:38 am | # | Reply

      One thats not Korean and not from the USA, just to be double sure. With a DNA test to be tripple sure. Oh and one thats at least as old as Amber’s dad to be really, really sure.

  6. L. Snart
    L. Snart
    October 1, 2010 at 12:36 am | # | Reply

    Comic of the year, all years. For saying Honkey\ Honkies.

  7. John
    John
    October 1, 2010 at 2:00 am | # | Reply

    I thought Jewish people fell into their own demographic…
    Also I can’t help but wonder what that city’s homosexual demographic is since at least at least a third of the store is also like that… Gah! This whole thing is making my brain hurt.

    • Malph
      Malph
      October 1, 2010 at 2:56 am | # | Reply

      30% may be about right. If it’s above average, Robin is a convert. If it’s below, just make Ninja Rick a gay asian (gaysian?) (he needs the attention).

    • KHNO
      KHNO
      October 1, 2010 at 4:20 am | # | Reply

      well I don’t know any demographic studies which could point who is really straight or not. LGB still tend to hide from publicy, so the percentage shown will always be lower than reality.

    • pakopako
      pakopako
      October 1, 2010 at 4:55 pm | # | Reply

      Common misconception. The Jewish are as much a subset of the scientific definition of the human race as the Muslim or the Catholic are.

      • Zorian
        Zorian
        October 3, 2010 at 1:01 am | # | Reply

        Jewish is the term for followers of Judaism.
        Hebrew is the name of an ethnicity that makes up most/all (depending on who you ask) of the followers of Judaism. :)
        Had this conversation while working on the 2000 Census.

      • yairm210
        yairm210
        August 29, 2011 at 2:07 pm | # | Reply

        Zorian is right, technically. But that’s not how the average Joe would classify himself.
        Speaking as one of both Jewish descent and religion, usually the distinction is whether you refer to yourself as “Jewish” or “A Jew”. “Jewish” denotes ancestry. while “A Jew” indicates religion.
        I’m not sure when this distinction popped up, since they used to make the same thing, but it does. It’s interesting, and I wish I knew more about when and why the distinction became pronounced.

    • Derik
      Derik
      October 2, 2010 at 6:28 pm | # | Reply

      I’m pretty sure Ultracar counts as handicapped on account of his wheels and need for ramp access.

    • Just Random
      Just Random
      October 2, 2010 at 8:12 pm | # | Reply

      Excellent point. She also gets to stay because although she’s white she’s one of the very few females working there, and if you’re gonna follow “demographics”, then shouldn’t 50% of the work force be female? XD

      And then, of course, there’s the age demographics…

  8. Brendan
    Brendan
    October 1, 2010 at 2:00 am | # | Reply

    Are there really that few Hispanics in San Francisco? Huh.

    • Shift
      Shift
      October 1, 2010 at 2:12 am | # | Reply

      There are more Hispanics in Southern California. Northern California had more Asian immigrants during the building of the railroads and the gold rush.

  9. Shift
    Shift
    October 1, 2010 at 2:13 am | # | Reply

    So is this Willis’ way of introducing a new character?

    • pakopako
      pakopako
      October 1, 2010 at 4:57 pm | # | Reply

      More likely than not, this will result in humorous blackface.

      Seriously, probably just another dig at Amber and Faz.

  10. AndyL
    AndyL
    October 1, 2010 at 2:26 am | # | Reply

    Clearly there’s a sampling problem with Faz’s demographic survey, since virtually all of Shortpacked customers are white.

    • gwalla
      gwalla
      October 4, 2010 at 11:52 am | # | Reply

      Depends on which neighborhood it’s located in.

  11. TexasNinjaBuzzard
    TexasNinjaBuzzard
    October 1, 2010 at 3:07 am | # | Reply

    Wait, when did California get around to recognizing Jews as “White”? Next thing you know they’ll count the Irish.

    • Michael
      Michael
      October 1, 2010 at 5:17 am | # | Reply

      You, sir, win the internet.

  12. Old_Crow
    Old_Crow
    October 1, 2010 at 3:27 am | # | Reply

    “Asian” is a very generic term. It could refer to Indians, Iranians, or any Orthadox Russian. I think the term you meant is “ORIENTAL.” This term is specific to the folks you are profiling here. It means someone from the regions south and southeast of the Himalayas and the Malay Archipelago west of Wallace’s line. When you refer to Koreans, Chinese, Japanese, and other smaller communities, “Oriental” is the proper term.

    • Andromeda
      Andromeda
      October 1, 2010 at 4:59 am | # | Reply

      In the world of super-political-correctness, “Oriental” is considered offensive.

      • Nick Wright
        Nick Wright
        October 1, 2010 at 10:31 am | # | Reply

        Or, you know, the regular world, post 1970.

        • Andromeda
          Andromeda
          October 2, 2010 at 12:33 am | # | Reply

          This world post 1970 is the world of super-political-correctness. Not necessarily a bad thing, although it can get quite annoying when people get ridiculous about it.

          However, in this instance I totally agree that the term is offensive.

        • LockeZ
          LockeZ
          October 2, 2010 at 3:39 am | # | Reply

          People don’t like the term “oriental” because it “conjures up images of exoticness,” but that isn’t even remotely the same thing as “offensive”. At worst, it’s as offensive as referring to Americans as cowboys. That’s not offensive, that’s fucking badass. You can mistakenly think that all Americans are Chuck Norris any day, we ain’t gonna complain.

    • LiamKav
      LiamKav
      October 1, 2010 at 5:56 am | # | Reply

      I always got the idea that in the US, “oriental” was, if not an out-and-out racist term, at least one that was considered a bit… suspect.

      (This doesn’t seem to apply to the UK though, where “asian” usually, but not always, referers to Indian/Pakistani/etc type people.)

      • Old_Crow
        Old_Crow
        October 1, 2010 at 6:12 am | # | Reply

        There’s nothing racist about it. Look it up in the dictionary. There is no shame attached to the word–anymore than calling myself “occidental” (from the west).

        But if we are worried about stepping on people’s toes, the term, “Asian,” is far more offensive. I don’t know many Iraqis or Russians who wish to be lumped together in a generic term. The Orientals I know don’t mind one way or the other but it is offensive to non-orientals (at least one Russian I know, anyway). So, you will offend (aprox) 50% of Asian people by using the term “Asian” to describe Orientals, specifically.

        I think it’s best to use specific language to avoid hurt feelings. “Asian” is not specific. It is bigotted because it slams together many diverse and disparate cultures into an all-purpose term.

        • Jon
          Jon
          October 1, 2010 at 8:37 am | # | Reply

          The term is absolutely racist; I don’t know why you seem to feel like you can speak for East Asians in this regard. The whole idea of an “Orient” where “Oriental” people come from is a function of Eurocentric imperialism. Calling yourself “Occidental” is not comparable considering how East Asia did not colonize Europe, exporting its cultural artifacts and heritage while Othering the people and importing drugs to get the population trapped in this one-sided economic relationship.

          This also ignores the fact that “Oriental” has referred to different regions over the course of history, as Europeans went further east. West Asia or, more commonly now, the Middle East used to be “the Orient”. Then India, and now it’s the furthest East of Asia.

          If you want to talk about the region of Asia that is Japan, Korea, and China, then just say “East Asian”.

          • Reepicheep-chan
            Reepicheep-chan
            October 1, 2010 at 11:55 am | # | Reply

            “West Asia or, more commonly now, the Middle East used to be “the Orient”. Then India, and now it’s the furthest East of Asia.”

            This. The term “Oriental” is meaningless to most people because “the Orient” keeps changing. And it just sounds xenophobic, like East Asians are mystical and exotic.

          • LockeZ
            LockeZ
            October 2, 2010 at 3:45 am | # | Reply

            East Asian is actually the same term as Oriental. They mean the same thing. One is Latin and the other is English, but they’re the same thing. People who think one is offensive all think the other is offensive too. So basically you’re retarded.

            The only real difference is, Oriental is in a language none of us speak, so it is actually LESS misleading, and thus less offensive. The area in question doesn’t include Russia, which is the easternmost country in Asia, so in theory a term without the word “east” in it would be ideal. But no such term exists, so we just use what the English language gives us.

        • Thenodrin
          Thenodrin
          October 1, 2010 at 8:52 am | # | Reply

          Rugs are Oriental. People are Asian.

          While you are correct in that Asian is less acceptable than Japanese, Chinese, Korean, etc. it is far more acceptable (at least, in the US) than the term Oriental.

          Theno

        • xaandria
          xaandria
          October 1, 2010 at 9:56 am | # | Reply

          “Brian, buddy, where ya been? The term is ‘Asian-American!’”

          “I know you are no intending to be…but calling me ‘Oriental’ offensive to me!”

          -“Everyone’s A Little Bit Racist Sometimes,” Avenue Q. Complete with R’s and L’s switched. Ah, Broadway.

          • Andromeda
            Andromeda
            October 2, 2010 at 12:24 am | # | Reply

            Totally what I had in mind.

          • Andromeda
            Andromeda
            October 2, 2010 at 12:37 am | # | Reply

            Even though that song is so racist.

            I find the amusingness of the song and its complete promotion stereotypes to be very morally conflicting.

          • Godbot
            Godbot
            October 2, 2010 at 1:08 am | # | Reply

            Evelyone’s a ritter bit lacist!

        • David Willis
          David Willis
          October 1, 2010 at 10:27 am | # | Reply

          Man, you are a riot.

        • Alex C.
          Alex C.
          October 1, 2010 at 2:37 pm | # | Reply

          Yikes. As a person of Japanese descent, I request that you never, ever, ever refer to me or my family as an ‘Oriental’. Yes, that is offensive. If you’re going to use an umbrella term, ‘Asian’ is much better. As others have noted, ‘Oriental’ is only the proper term as considered by elderly people and racists.

        • JesseJane
          JesseJane
          October 1, 2010 at 8:47 pm | # | Reply

          Oriental is offensive, it makes me sound like a damn ramen flavor! Asian is fine. Oriental is incredibly insulting! Seriously people, incorrect PC bs, is more insulting than racism. At least racism is honest. Insulting people in the process of trying to “protect their feelings” is worse, because it comes off like not only are we [those being insulted] incapable of standing up for ourselves, but also YOU COULDN’T EVEN BE BOTHERED TO GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!

          • LockeZ
            LockeZ
            October 2, 2010 at 3:51 am | # | Reply

            Being politically incorrect is more offensive than racism? Jesus H. Christ. You’re the problem with the world today. Go shoot yourself in the face with one of those buzzsaw launchers from Mega Man games.

      • Nanu
        Nanu
        October 1, 2010 at 8:47 am | # | Reply

        Yes it is a pretty suspect term in the US at least. Only people who use it are racists and reaaaallly old people.

        • begbert2
          begbert2
          October 1, 2010 at 10:45 am | # | Reply

          Or perfectly ordinary people who didn’t get the memo that it was suddenly bad – or at least, any worse than the term “asian”.

          (I may have spent too much time reading *books* from before 1970. I personally can’t think of an instance where I’ve seen the term “oriental” *be* racist, beyond the fact that it describes a particular category of people.)

          • smirkette
            smirkette
            October 1, 2010 at 11:18 am | # | Reply

            Well, every person of Asian decent that I know (and I know a lot of ‘em, living & growing up in San Francisco) “oriental” is akin to “colored”. Hey, you didn’t know any better, no big deal. Now you do!

          • Trae Dorn
            Trae Dorn
            October 1, 2010 at 11:44 am | # | Reply

            “Suddenly” bad? It’s been considered inappropriate for quite a while…

          • gwalla
            gwalla
            October 1, 2010 at 11:49 am | # | Reply

            It became inappropriate sometime in the ’70s, I believe. Which is about when white people started to realize that terms that didn’t apply to black people might also be racist.

          • laila
            laila
            October 3, 2010 at 7:58 pm | # | Reply

            Or, you know, non-Americans.

            I’m from England. I got the memo that ‘Oriental’ was offensive, so made an effort not to use it any more – at which point I realized that most people this side of the pond hadn’t gotten that memo and now thought I didn’t know what part of the world I was talking about. I’d rather not risk offending someone than look geographically challenged, but that really does appear to be the choice over here.

          • MrGBH
            MrGBH
            October 5, 2010 at 9:40 am | # | Reply

            I’m also from England. I never got any memo that Oriental was a rascist term. Considering that I only know one person of Japanese descent (It may be a long phrase, but it’s as PC as it’s possible to get). I’ll have to ask her if she considers it offensive. (Unless she’s actually of Chinese descent. Or Thai, or Korean or something else I haven’t thought of).

            As far as I know, the only truly offensive words are Nigger and Paki, since there are no circumstances where they’re either appropriate or accidental. As long as you stay away from those, most people won’t give a ****. And if they do, apologise, explain and don’t do it again.

  13. Dave
    Dave
    October 1, 2010 at 5:37 am | # | Reply

    Well, technically Glasso has nothing to worry about, aside from ‘doing the right thing’. I doubt he’s a federal contractor, and he certainly doesn’t have 50 or more employees, so he would not require to establish Affirmative Action plans (which is where all this demographic and representation mumbo-jumbo would come into play.) Sorry for geeking out there….this is what I do for a living. :)

  14. Jeff
    Jeff
    October 1, 2010 at 7:36 am | # | Reply

    they could get Billie now that she’s half Asian

    • beeftony
      beeftony
      October 2, 2010 at 1:49 pm | # | Reply

      Doubt it, since she’s already an accomplished journalist and IW! characters other than Mike, Robin and Ultra Car only make cameos in this comic. Besides, she’s getting plenty of attention over in Dumbing of Age, so I really don’t see why we’d need to bring her over here.

      • Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
        Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
        October 3, 2010 at 6:45 pm | # | Reply

        And besides, Billie is only half-Asian in the “Dumbing of Age” universe — here in the regular Walkyverse, she’s English. Similarly, in “Dumbing of Age” Ruth has a different name: it’s Lessick, rather than Lesse.

  15. Rick Sivart
    Rick Sivart
    October 1, 2010 at 9:57 am | # | Reply

    Well, Robin’s DNA has some Martian mixed in, so she isn’t 100% white. And who knows what Mike’s DNA would show?

    Possible solutions:

    All employees go on a genealogy website and finds that they all have some asian ancestry and their combined asain percentage ends up being greater than 30% making Faz’s employment redundant.

    Robin gets a bill passed in congress forcing 2/3 of the asians to move.

    • Nick Wright
      Nick Wright
      October 1, 2010 at 10:34 am | # | Reply

      Robin is Hispanic, at least in large part.

    • No0ne
      No0ne
      October 2, 2010 at 12:28 pm | # | Reply

      Robin’s still got that Martian DNA, which makes her an uber minority. According to the logic of Galasso no doubt that would mean he would have to fire her. I mean come on how many people have Martian DNA who are A: Still alive and B: Living around Shortpacked? Yea, I’m counting 2. Mike and Robin. Although some other former SEMME agents could live in the area I’m betting it’s still not enough to make hiring one of them fit the demographics, much less two. Thank goodness for government secrets right?

      • Derik
        Derik
        October 2, 2010 at 6:34 pm | # | Reply

        Doesn’t Agatha or someone live in the area and work at the increasingly-sinister McAwesome’s?

  16. KenB3
    KenB3
    October 1, 2010 at 10:12 am | # | Reply

    I am curious where they live that has such a high Asian population in the United States. Maybe there are communities like that on the West Coast, I am not sure.

    • Ian
      Ian
      October 1, 2010 at 10:32 am | # | Reply

      As I recall, they live in San Francisco, which is full of inscrutable Chinamen.

      I’m still allowed to say that, right?

      • begbert2
        begbert2
        October 1, 2010 at 10:47 am | # | Reply

        No, the word “of” is racist nowadays.

  17. drpepperfan
    drpepperfan
    October 1, 2010 at 10:39 am | # | Reply

    Speaking of Ultra Car, where is he? It seems like we haven’t seen him in months, where’s he gone?

    • No0ne
      No0ne
      October 2, 2010 at 12:31 pm | # | Reply

      The Aliens got him! Wait… no… He’s busy being Spider Car and making Robin think he is actually some other person who makes no sense… Because we all know spider car is really PRESIDENT OBAMA! Which would explain why nothing is getting done in DC…

      • Derik
        Derik
        October 2, 2010 at 6:36 pm | # | Reply

        Which talking car works at McAwesomes anyway?

  18. Matt
    Matt
    October 1, 2010 at 10:42 am | # | Reply

    Well, Ultra Car was a Jeep, wasn’t he? So I’d say he definitely doesn’t qualify as Asian, but then, since he’s a hybrid now, there’s a chance Joe gutted a Prius and used some of it’s parts.

  19. begbert2
    begbert2
    October 1, 2010 at 10:49 am | # | Reply

    I thought talking cars were everywhere now. Is Shortpacked really still overrepresented?

    (Perhaps Ethan is basing his statement on speciesist polls that exclude them.)

    • Pagannerd
      Pagannerd
      October 1, 2010 at 11:14 am | # | Reply

      UltraCar isn’t a biological organism. Could talking cars be considered a “Species”?

      What would robotic racism be? Technism? Autoism? No, wait: Mechanism!

      …That sounded funnier in my head.

      • Platonix
        Platonix
        October 1, 2010 at 8:29 pm | # | Reply

        Don’t worry, it was perfectly funny in mine, too.

    • David Willis
      David Willis
      October 1, 2010 at 11:19 am | # | Reply

      The Toyota Camry is one of the best-selling cars in the United States, and they sold 350,000 cars in 2009. The United States has 310,000,000 people. Over a small number of years of people buying Camrys, those sales are going to accumulate to probably over one percent?

      Lots of people own Rosenthal Zoomers in fictional San Francisco, but certainly not approaching TEN percent, which would be the number required to justify one talking car employee based on Galasso’s criteria.

  20. Ethan
    Ethan
    October 1, 2010 at 11:15 am | # | Reply

    “Overhonkied” is my new favorite word.

  21. Ethan Shuster
    Ethan Shuster
    October 1, 2010 at 11:45 am | # | Reply

    The use of the term “oriental” is interesting to me, because I know for a fact there are many people who have no idea that’s considered racist by some. It seems for whatever the reason, it’s not as known as say, some very special terms for black folks. Not to excuse it, but it’s not an obvious, hateful kind of name as some terms may be to people.

    • begbert2
      begbert2
      October 1, 2010 at 3:19 pm | # | Reply

      The vague vague impression I’m getting here is that “oriental” is within one or two orders of offensiveness-magnitude as, say, “colored” (which I gather is not appropriate anymore). If it’s anywhere in the same solar system as n****r, then I really missed the memo.

      • Platonix
        Platonix
        October 1, 2010 at 8:32 pm | # | Reply

        Oh, “colored” is quite racist. Mostly because it ignores the fact that light peach is, surprise surprise, a color. Everybody‘s colored…and before you mention albinos, white’s a color too.

        • David Willis
          David Willis
          October 1, 2010 at 8:33 pm | # | Reply

          DC Talk had a song about this!

          • Jimmy
            Jimmy
            October 2, 2010 at 2:00 am | # | Reply

            That was a good song. I miss DC Talk!

        • StClair
          StClair
          October 1, 2010 at 9:30 pm | # | Reply

          I’ve been known to joke that I don’t have a color, I have an albedo.

    • pakopako
      pakopako
      October 1, 2010 at 4:56 pm | # | Reply

      I miss the time when people were divided into two distinct categories of Oriental and Occidental.

      That DID happen, right?

      • StClair
        StClair
        October 1, 2010 at 9:32 pm | # | Reply

        Yes, but only in formal contexts; “wogs” and “us” was a lot more common. :p

      • Derik
        Derik
        October 2, 2010 at 6:41 pm | # | Reply

        So what does it matter if Shortpacked!‘s employees are a little occident-prone?
        (It’s not like the store provides health insurance.)

    • Vigilante Mark
      Vigilante Mark
      October 1, 2010 at 10:35 pm | # | Reply

      I’ve always wondered if the confusion didn’t have something to do with the fact that the word still seems to be a fairly commonplace, and seemingly accepted, descriptor for foods. It *can’t* be unspeakable if it’s printed right on a box in the supermarket, right? Not that I ever expended too much thought on it, but it’s struck me as odd before.

      You had to know what kind of conversation this storyline would generate, Mr. Willis…thumbs-up for bravery.

    • L. Snart
      L. Snart
      October 2, 2010 at 4:51 pm | # | Reply

      From what I gathered, “Oriental” is only racist if you call a person that.
      If you’re talking bout an oriental rug, its okay.
      Talking about the China-man down the street you are being a honky.
      China man is also kinda on the “Do NOT use” list

      • LiamKav
        LiamKav
        October 3, 2010 at 6:49 pm | # | Reply

        I’m guessing that’s also why the food is still called “Peking Duck”, when the actual place is now called “Bejing”.

        • gwalla
          gwalla
          October 4, 2010 at 12:21 pm | # | Reply

          AIUI that’s really due to switching from one type of romanization of Mandarin to another.

  22. MrGBH
    MrGBH
    October 1, 2010 at 11:46 am | # | Reply

    So Galasso won’t fire Jacob because he’s black, but he’ll fire anyone except Ethan because they’re white? Yeah, that matches the definition of Racism.

    • gwalla
      gwalla
      October 1, 2010 at 11:52 am | # | Reply

      This just in: Galasso is not a good person, and also kind of crazy

      • No0ne
        No0ne
        October 2, 2010 at 12:39 pm | # | Reply

        I DON’T BELIVE IT!

        Theres no way he can’t be a nice guy!

    • AndyL
      AndyL
      October 2, 2010 at 1:03 pm | # | Reply

      I recommend firing everyone and then rehiring with the appropriate racial and social mix.

  23. Mysterious Stranger
    Mysterious Stranger
    October 1, 2010 at 11:57 am | # | Reply

    Its about time Ninja Rick got some love in this strip. Even if he’s a punchline. Willis, have I pitched you my Ninja Rick spin-off idea?

    • SC
      SC
      October 2, 2010 at 12:44 pm | # | Reply

      don’t worry, he’ll be the only character left by 2015.

  24. izzatrix
    izzatrix
    October 1, 2010 at 12:12 pm | # | Reply

    I wonder what the demographics are in Conquest’s stores? Surely Galasso would consider those part of his empire.

  25. PieLord
    PieLord
    October 1, 2010 at 4:16 pm | # | Reply

    I clicked the comic a few times before I realized I finished reading through all the archives.

    …What will I do whith my spare time now?

    • MrGBH
      MrGBH
      October 1, 2010 at 4:40 pm | # | Reply

      Read Dumbing Of Age silly.

  26. frosgrok
    frosgrok
    October 1, 2010 at 5:01 pm | # | Reply

    Silly humans.
    Dividing your little pebble of a planet into itty bitty chunks and then calling each other names over it.

    Looks like a small speck inside your local planetary system.

    Can’t even find your star without a guide.

    Probably just as well you can’t figure out how to get out.

    • StClair
      StClair
      October 1, 2010 at 9:33 pm | # | Reply

      I can find my star pretty well most days – I go outside and look for the big yellow thing in the sky.
      (Mind you, with fall coming on, that’s going to get a bit harder..)

      • No0ne
        No0ne
        October 2, 2010 at 12:41 pm | # | Reply

        It’s Yellow? No wonder Earthlings are so ugly, aqua marine stars are much prettier…

  27. Cy Reb, Jr.
    Cy Reb, Jr.
    October 1, 2010 at 5:44 pm | # | Reply

    Why worry about who’s going to be fired? The obvious answer is to hire 2-4 more employees without firing anyone.
    Oh, “cutting into profits,” you say? Nonsense. If this demographic calibration is as important as you’re saying, you need all the current employees to help train the recruits.

  28. KaGAmi
    KaGAmi
    October 2, 2010 at 3:12 am | # | Reply

    I hope you plan on redrawing those hands in the second panel.

    • Astro
      Astro
      October 2, 2010 at 6:53 am | # | Reply

      Great. Now I can’t stop looking at them.

  29. Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
    Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
    October 2, 2010 at 7:15 am | # | Reply

    I, too, feel “overhonkied” is a fun new word the whole family can enjoy.

    -Cavan

    • Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
      Cavan Kerr O'Donnelly
      October 2, 2010 at 7:19 am | # | Reply

      Also, Cyclops getting crapped upon is very appropriate for my life, particularly in the last few months.

      I tried to give her a ring, all right?

      -Cavan, who could really use a “Do Over.”

      • LiamKav
        LiamKav
        October 3, 2010 at 6:50 pm | # | Reply

        …

        Am I missing the other side of this conversation?

  30. Dan Android
    Dan Android
    October 2, 2010 at 1:05 pm | # | Reply

    I dare say this comic has come up 9 times out of 10 when I go random.

  31. LiamKav
    LiamKav
    October 3, 2010 at 6:57 pm | # | Reply

    @No0ne

    “But, then couldn’t people who prescribe to the theory of evolution make the argument that we are all Asians? Or from where ever they say we evolved from, I can’t keep track it changes on what seems to be a weekly basis…

    I say people who prescribe because I do not.”

    I’m not sure if you’re just trying to fan flames, but…

    Homo Sapients most likely evolved out of Africa some 200,000 years ago. This has been the theory for…oooh, decades. Saying “It seems to change every time I look” reminds me of old people saying “I used to be able to call them ‘coloured’, but NOW it’s suddenly changed. They keep changing the names every time I check”.

    Of course, if you don’t believe in evolution, you could just say that a wizard is to blame. Or the Unicron singularity.

    (You don’t “perscribe” to the theory of evolution. Anymore than you “perscribe” to the theory of gravity.)

    • Calbeck
      Calbeck
      October 3, 2010 at 11:44 pm | # | Reply

      Well, remember that “African-American” came about because someone was offended by “Black”. And “Black” was because someone was offended by “Colored”. And “Colored” replaced “Negro”. And so on…

      The same is true of many other “sensitive” terms: “idiot” and “moron” used to be actual descriptors of a given level of intellect or social station, not insults. There came “slow”, followed by “retarded”, then “special needs”, and so on — each “sensitive” term being used to replace its predecessor because the new one had come to be used in the same insulting manner in general usage.

      Chasing the verbage doesn’t address the issue.

      • LiamKav
        LiamKav
        October 4, 2010 at 6:16 am | # | Reply

        True. Once the public has lept on a scientific term and started using it as an insult (like “Mongoloid” or “idiot”), then it’s not surprising that the scientific community then moves away from those terms.

        I was more picking on the “they keep changing the terms so I can’t keep up” excuse, normally used to explain why someone is using the term “coloured” even though that hasn’t been acceptable for decaded. I’ve just never seen it used to argue against evolution before.

        True story: my girlfriend is a pathologist, and on her autopsy’s she has to write the person’s race. She has a colleague who will cross out where she writes “black/white/etc” and put in “Negroid/Caucasoid/Mongoloid”, arguing that it’s the correct scientific term.

        This is a 35 year old guy, born in the UK, working in the UK as a doctor who thinks that it’s perfectly fine to write “mongoloid” on a patients notes. Thank god he doesn’t work on the wards.

        (Also, is “black” actually offensive in the US? I thought it was decided that avoid that was being oversensitive? It’s fine in the UK. Well, saying someone is black is. Referring to “the blacks” isn’t, but it took me 15 years to get my family to stop saying “coloured”, so one step at a time.)

        • Calbeck
          Calbeck
          October 11, 2010 at 3:12 am | # | Reply

          “Black” can indeed be offensive, entirely as a matter of who’s decided to be insulted by it. Mainly because within the Black community, there continues to be a heated internal race-mixing war where the “depth” of one’s “blackness” is used as a means of striation, the blacker the “better”.

          Persons who are lighter-skinned, because one or more of their ancestors were white or Asian, are often ostracised…so, there are elitists who are insulted that someone who’s not as black as they are get called black, and some folks with lighter skin who feel insulted because they’re reminded of the false stigma.

      • gwalla
        gwalla
        October 4, 2010 at 12:41 pm | # | Reply

        There’s actually a term for that in philology: “the euphemism treadmill”.

        But that’s not really what LiamKav was talking about.

    • Ristar
      Ristar
      December 15, 2010 at 10:39 am | # | Reply

      FYI, note the word THEORY in front of both, and the fact that many physicists believe gravity is a myth. ;)

  32. Brady Kj
    Brady Kj
    October 3, 2010 at 9:18 pm | # | Reply

    Oh, by the way, the proper term is Mongoloid.

  33. Pippin4242
    Pippin4242
    October 3, 2010 at 10:59 pm | # | Reply

    Oriental=/=offensive in the UK – I mean, I cheerfully refer to myself as a ‘westerner’ near-daily, and it’s etymologically exactly the same thing.

    • David Willis
      David Willis
      October 3, 2010 at 11:05 pm | # | Reply

      I don’t think shared etymology is what makes words offensive. It’s like saying that because you can call yourself a cracker that it’s okay to use the N-word.

      • Calbeck
        Calbeck
        October 3, 2010 at 11:38 pm | # | Reply

        Or that it’s okay to use the C-word if you’re black and can call yourself the N-word.

        It’s all about marginalizing people in order to feel superior, regardless of race.

        • LiamKav
          LiamKav
          October 4, 2010 at 6:18 am | # | Reply

          I suppose that’s the difference, that since “oriental” isn’t used as an offensive term in the UK, then it’s not offensive. Maybe. I’d check, but the only Chinese people I know are from Malaysia and are pretty much more racist than anyone else I know, so they’re not the best people to ask.

          (I think it’s also more common to just say “Chinese” or “Japanese” or whatever over here, so it doesn’t really come up.)

        • LiamKav
          LiamKav
          October 4, 2010 at 6:20 am | # | Reply

          Thinking about if further, I suppose the closest UK equivalent would be those people who say that calling people “Pakis” is fine because they are from “Pakistan”. As has been pointed out, it doesn’t matter if the word has scientific basis. If it’s offensive, it’s offensive.

          • MrGBH
            MrGBH
            October 5, 2010 at 9:48 am | # | Reply

            The correct term would be Pakistani, but only if they’re actually from Pakistan and not Bangladesh or Iraq, etc.

  34. Calbeck
    Calbeck
    October 3, 2010 at 11:37 pm | # | Reply

    Yep. That’s stupid liberal guilt.

    Pretty much the same thing as stupid conservative guilt over a public statue that shows a boob poking out.

  35. Ruri
    Ruri
    October 4, 2010 at 3:58 am | # | Reply

    Anyone else find it hilarious that the word of Faz sparked off multiple conversations where people shared their learned opinions about race,racism,demographic surveys etc?Especially seen as,being Faz,he probably made those numbers up.

  36. gwalla
    gwalla
    October 4, 2010 at 12:20 pm | # | Reply

    AIUI that’s really due to switching from one type of romanization of Mandarin to another.

    • gwalla
      gwalla
      October 4, 2010 at 12:25 pm | # | Reply

      Dammit, that was supposed to be a reply.

  37. SonicBlueRanger
    SonicBlueRanger
    August 22, 2011 at 4:16 pm | # | Reply

    I must find a way to use the phrase OverHonkied in real life.

Comment ¬
Cancel reply

NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Convention appearances:

Calgary Expo Calgary, AB: April 26-28
Phoenix Comicon Phoenix, AZ: May 23-26, 2013
BotCon San Diego, CA: June 28-30
San Diego Comic-Con San Diego, CA: July 18-21
SPX Bethesda, MD: September 14-15

Roomies! It's Walky! Joyce and Walky!
Multiplex
Sorcery 101
Templar, AZ

The Transformers Wiki

Hail to the Slash

80 page GIANT
Axe Cop
The Book of Biff
Butt-Taco
Comics Curmudgeon
College Roomies from Hell!!!
Diesel Sweeties
Dinosaur Comics
Dr. McNinja
Dresden Codak
Fans!
Fleen
Gastrophobia
Girl Genius
Girls with Slingshots
Goats
Hark, a vagrant
Hijinks Ensue
Intrepid Girlbot
Legend of Bill
Medium Large
Not Invented Here
Octopus Pie
Overcompensating
Penny Arcade
PhDcomics
Power Nap
Questionable Content
Real Life
Rob and Elliot
Bad Machinery
Schlock Mercenary
Sheldon
So Far Apart
Something Positive
Two Lumps
Wapsi Square
Wonderella
Wondermark

Frumph.NET

Tags

amber animated batman botcon conquest conventions dark of the moon david willis dinobot drew duncan ethan faz galasso generations gijoe guest strip hamsters homosexuality jacob jesus joe justice league ken leslie malaya megatron merch mike ninja rick nipple optimus prime politics religion robin desanto ronald reagan roz sdcc sg ravage shattered glass star wars tni strips transformers transformers prime ultra car

©2005-2013 David Willis | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑