<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/</link>
	<description>Toys are serious business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-119016</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-119016</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an actual Reagan quote, incidentally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an actual Reagan quote, incidentally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkReed</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-105275</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkReed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-105275</guid>
		<description>The moment Roz left, Reagan came back.

Now, which of them is the secret identity of the other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moment Roz left, Reagan came back.</p>
<p>Now, which of them is the secret identity of the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portmaneau</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-101185</link>
		<dc:creator>Portmaneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-101185</guid>
		<description>How can you not smile when you see Ronnie&#039;s face?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you not smile when you see Ronnie&#8217;s face?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-66495</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-66495</guid>
		<description>Well said sir. Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said sir. Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarnor</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-62784</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-62784</guid>
		<description>And when you let yourself play the &quot;victim&quot; in your mind you fall into the trap of everything negative you have.

Are there obstacles to overcome in life?  Sure.  The first is to take responsibility for your own actions and path in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when you let yourself play the &#8220;victim&#8221; in your mind you fall into the trap of everything negative you have.</p>
<p>Are there obstacles to overcome in life?  Sure.  The first is to take responsibility for your own actions and path in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molochmachine</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-61605</link>
		<dc:creator>molochmachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-61605</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m not saying that all Republicans are racist sexist homophobes, just the people they choose to elect into office to represent them, are.&quot; --David Cross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not saying that all Republicans are racist sexist homophobes, just the people they choose to elect into office to represent them, are.&#8221; &#8211;David Cross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas0comer</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-58635</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas0comer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-58635</guid>
		<description>No, cheesedammit! YOU MENTIONED POLITICS! HISSSSSSSSSSSSS *runs away*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, cheesedammit! YOU MENTIONED POLITICS! HISSSSSSSSSSSSS *runs away*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phildog</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-42040</link>
		<dc:creator>phildog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-42040</guid>
		<description>What the fuck is he talking about? &quot;There are no barriers to progress except the ones we errect ourselves&quot;? BULLSHIT. There are plenty. There are economical barriers. Caste barriers. Social barriers. Geographic barriers. Biological barriers. Knowledge barriers. Time barriers.

The chances one has in life of gaining happiness are always in the hands of circumstance. People who don&#039;t realize this should take a step the fuck back and look at all the great things they&#039;ve been given. Free education. Literacy. A home, and an allowance. Constitutionally protected speech. Living in a free country. God fucking damn, being alive and healthy even. Jesus Christ, learn to appreciate what you have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the fuck is he talking about? &#8220;There are no barriers to progress except the ones we errect ourselves&#8221;? BULLSHIT. There are plenty. There are economical barriers. Caste barriers. Social barriers. Geographic barriers. Biological barriers. Knowledge barriers. Time barriers.</p>
<p>The chances one has in life of gaining happiness are always in the hands of circumstance. People who don&#8217;t realize this should take a step the fuck back and look at all the great things they&#8217;ve been given. Free education. Literacy. A home, and an allowance. Constitutionally protected speech. Living in a free country. God fucking damn, being alive and healthy even. Jesus Christ, learn to appreciate what you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despite Rage</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-41012</link>
		<dc:creator>Despite Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-41012</guid>
		<description>First, I have every right to say whatever I want but I&#039;m willing to believe that you meant that I don&#039;t have call or reason to say that. Second, I&#039;m sorry if I offended anybody with the word bigot. I meant it as a joke where I was gently chiding about a preconception that many people share. I didn&#039;t mean to be truly offensive. I was copying a line that a comedienne, Brett Butler used. She was talking about growing up in the South surrounded by racists and that she &quot;hates bigots so much she turned into one&quot;. I probably could have done a better job expressing that. Third, if you really want to quibble the OP is expressing a belief that certain people have to prove that they are not a certain way before the OP is willing to change their mind. That&#039;s a preconceived idea about a group, and since we&#039;re talking about a negative belief I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s bigotry. It&#039;s just a politically acceptable form of it. In a perfect world nobody should assume that group of people X all share negative trait Y and that they must prove that they don&#039;t to be considered an exception. 
In reality, it works more like this
Considered freaking horrible (and I firmly agree)
     Blacks = criminals, Gays = deviants, Women = bad drivers
Considered okay
     Conservatives = stuck in the 50&#039;s, Republicans = gun toting ignorant rednecks, Catholics = pedophiles

In general I agree that the Right has way too many anti-gay, racist and misogynist members and politicians. I even alluded to that in my first post. I also said that I thought they were getting pushed out and marginalized, although I&#039;m not that optimistic today because I&#039;ve been listening to some disgraceful coverage of a gay student that got murdered (I&#039;m in a bad mood at the moment). But, there is a big difference between saying that and implying that everybody on the right is a racist/gay-bashing/woman-hating neanderthal unless they prove otherwise. You yourself took a pretty balanced approach when you were describing Conservatives (nothing I can disagree with there, we do have way too much anti-gay BS on the right), and even a forgiving view of the people that vote against gay rights (possibly even more forgiving that I would be). You also made it pretty clear that not everybody on the Right feels the same way. That&#039;s a good way to approach the world and I applaud you. IMO there isn&#039;t nearly enough of that from the Right or the Left.

Finally, I wanted to say that I think you&#039;re wrong about the Right taking a strong stance for equality, but I wish you weren&#039;t. Individual politicians can take that view, some have and I think it&#039;s helped. Others get blasted by a biased media, called liars and it&#039;s pretty much assumed that those politicians are just trying to get votes (the media&#039;s reaction to Bush&#039;s attempt to pass immigration reform comes to mind). The more Republicans that are involved the greater the opportunity for the media to make up motivations for them, and it doesn&#039;t matter if they really felt that way or not. Quite simply, I think part of the reason the Right is stuck on the wrong side of so many issues is because they&#039;re kept there by what people are already convinced the entire Republican Party stands for. It&#039;s expecting way too much to ask a politician to take a stand outside the expected when they know they will get hammered by the opposition and they might get hammered by their own side (even if we didn&#039;t have too many racists, nobody likes a panderer and the media is telling us that somebody is pandering for votes... therefore we no longer like that politician QED). A few brave souls will take that chance, but it can&#039;t be many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I have every right to say whatever I want but I&#8217;m willing to believe that you meant that I don&#8217;t have call or reason to say that. Second, I&#8217;m sorry if I offended anybody with the word bigot. I meant it as a joke where I was gently chiding about a preconception that many people share. I didn&#8217;t mean to be truly offensive. I was copying a line that a comedienne, Brett Butler used. She was talking about growing up in the South surrounded by racists and that she &#8220;hates bigots so much she turned into one&#8221;. I probably could have done a better job expressing that. Third, if you really want to quibble the OP is expressing a belief that certain people have to prove that they are not a certain way before the OP is willing to change their mind. That&#8217;s a preconceived idea about a group, and since we&#8217;re talking about a negative belief I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s bigotry. It&#8217;s just a politically acceptable form of it. In a perfect world nobody should assume that group of people X all share negative trait Y and that they must prove that they don&#8217;t to be considered an exception.<br />
In reality, it works more like this<br />
Considered freaking horrible (and I firmly agree)<br />
     Blacks = criminals, Gays = deviants, Women = bad drivers<br />
Considered okay<br />
     Conservatives = stuck in the 50&#8242;s, Republicans = gun toting ignorant rednecks, Catholics = pedophiles</p>
<p>In general I agree that the Right has way too many anti-gay, racist and misogynist members and politicians. I even alluded to that in my first post. I also said that I thought they were getting pushed out and marginalized, although I&#8217;m not that optimistic today because I&#8217;ve been listening to some disgraceful coverage of a gay student that got murdered (I&#8217;m in a bad mood at the moment). But, there is a big difference between saying that and implying that everybody on the right is a racist/gay-bashing/woman-hating neanderthal unless they prove otherwise. You yourself took a pretty balanced approach when you were describing Conservatives (nothing I can disagree with there, we do have way too much anti-gay BS on the right), and even a forgiving view of the people that vote against gay rights (possibly even more forgiving that I would be). You also made it pretty clear that not everybody on the Right feels the same way. That&#8217;s a good way to approach the world and I applaud you. IMO there isn&#8217;t nearly enough of that from the Right or the Left.</p>
<p>Finally, I wanted to say that I think you&#8217;re wrong about the Right taking a strong stance for equality, but I wish you weren&#8217;t. Individual politicians can take that view, some have and I think it&#8217;s helped. Others get blasted by a biased media, called liars and it&#8217;s pretty much assumed that those politicians are just trying to get votes (the media&#8217;s reaction to Bush&#8217;s attempt to pass immigration reform comes to mind). The more Republicans that are involved the greater the opportunity for the media to make up motivations for them, and it doesn&#8217;t matter if they really felt that way or not. Quite simply, I think part of the reason the Right is stuck on the wrong side of so many issues is because they&#8217;re kept there by what people are already convinced the entire Republican Party stands for. It&#8217;s expecting way too much to ask a politician to take a stand outside the expected when they know they will get hammered by the opposition and they might get hammered by their own side (even if we didn&#8217;t have too many racists, nobody likes a panderer and the media is telling us that somebody is pandering for votes&#8230; therefore we no longer like that politician QED). A few brave souls will take that chance, but it can&#8217;t be many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2009/comic/book-9/07-hello-roz-goodbye-reagan/reagan-2/#comment-36498</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2009/07/23/reagan-2/#comment-36498</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but most of your comment is way off. You had no right to call that other commenter bigot. That commenter was just telling the truth. The Republican party has turned itself into the anti-gay party. Nearly every anti-gay legislation entered into congress is done by republican politicians and voted on by republican citizens. I&#039;m not saying all conservatives hate gays. (I have very conservative friends and I&#039;m flaming, so they must like queers.) But, most of the big name republican politicians are anti-gay and when people are surveyed, republicans always come out as more anti-gay than moderates or democrats. This isn&#039;t an insult, just a fact.

I personally believe that most people who vote against pro-gay rights issues don&#039;t really hate gays. They are just scared of the changing times or things they don&#039;t understand. There are the very few who do truly hate gays. The haters lie to the others and get them to believe that gay marriage will lead to people marrying goats and children watching porn in elementary school. Then people get scared and vote out of fear, not hate.

I do agree that democratic politicians need to do more and stop pussyfooting around. Too many of them are comfortable on the fence, because they know LGBTs are more likely to vote on the left, because voting on the right is almost always a worst choice. Even though I am on the left, I don&#039;t think a gay person should vote democratic just because the democratic party is slightly more supportive. That person should vote for who they believe in, and hopefully, whoever they vote for believes in equality.

Also, if the right stood up for equality, no one would ignore that. Many people, like me, would be ecstatic and welcoming. Actually, I think that would be most people&#039;s reaction. It would be a great thing. A few republican politicians have supported gay rights and they were celebrated by the citizens on the left and the right. So, YES, the conservatives &quot;should stage a march, sign a petition and support politicians that denounce those things and maybe make them sign a pledge.&quot; Because, thousands of people&#039;s lives depend on it, millions would be happy to see it happen, and obviously, its the right thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but most of your comment is way off. You had no right to call that other commenter bigot. That commenter was just telling the truth. The Republican party has turned itself into the anti-gay party. Nearly every anti-gay legislation entered into congress is done by republican politicians and voted on by republican citizens. I&#8217;m not saying all conservatives hate gays. (I have very conservative friends and I&#8217;m flaming, so they must like queers.) But, most of the big name republican politicians are anti-gay and when people are surveyed, republicans always come out as more anti-gay than moderates or democrats. This isn&#8217;t an insult, just a fact.</p>
<p>I personally believe that most people who vote against pro-gay rights issues don&#8217;t really hate gays. They are just scared of the changing times or things they don&#8217;t understand. There are the very few who do truly hate gays. The haters lie to the others and get them to believe that gay marriage will lead to people marrying goats and children watching porn in elementary school. Then people get scared and vote out of fear, not hate.</p>
<p>I do agree that democratic politicians need to do more and stop pussyfooting around. Too many of them are comfortable on the fence, because they know LGBTs are more likely to vote on the left, because voting on the right is almost always a worst choice. Even though I am on the left, I don&#8217;t think a gay person should vote democratic just because the democratic party is slightly more supportive. That person should vote for who they believe in, and hopefully, whoever they vote for believes in equality.</p>
<p>Also, if the right stood up for equality, no one would ignore that. Many people, like me, would be ecstatic and welcoming. Actually, I think that would be most people&#8217;s reaction. It would be a great thing. A few republican politicians have supported gay rights and they were celebrated by the citizens on the left and the right. So, YES, the conservatives &#8220;should stage a march, sign a petition and support politicians that denounce those things and maybe make them sign a pledge.&#8221; Because, thousands of people&#8217;s lives depend on it, millions would be happy to see it happen, and obviously, its the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
