Comments on: Resticker http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/ Toys are serious business. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:28:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: foL http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-128283 foL Tue, 07 May 2013 17:28:52 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-128283 I kind of feel sorry for SonicBlueRanger. I kind of feel sorry for SonicBlueRanger.

]]> By: dcmeserve http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-115949 dcmeserve Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:40:51 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-115949 No, you're not a jerk, you're a "pedant". I'm learning stuff from ShortPacked! comments! No, you’re not a jerk, you’re a “pedant”.

I’m learning stuff from ShortPacked! comments!

]]> By: Narf http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-114159 Narf Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:23:56 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-114159 And earlier, he didn't use an apostrophe to pluralize "storylines," so he must, on some level, KNOW that you don't use them to create plurals, so... so... *brain leaks out of ears* And earlier, he didn’t use an apostrophe to pluralize “storylines,” so he must, on some level, KNOW that you don’t use them to create plurals, so… so… *brain leaks out of ears*

]]> By: Narf http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-114157 Narf Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:22:21 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-114157 Yeah, that's pretty bad. I mean, if someone is going to fuck something up, couldn't they at least fuck up consistently? guy's (guys) is an incorrectly pluralized noun. who's (whose) is an incorrectly placed contraction of "who is." name's (names) is another incorrect pluralization. Three apostrophes when you didn't even need one. ...You know, I'm actually a little impressed. :x lol Yeah, that’s pretty bad. I mean, if someone is going to fuck something up, couldn’t they at least fuck up consistently?

guy’s (guys) is an incorrectly pluralized noun.
who’s (whose) is an incorrectly placed contraction of “who is.”
name’s (names) is another incorrect pluralization.

Three apostrophes when you didn’t even need one.

…You know, I’m actually a little impressed. :x lol

]]> By: VersasoVantare http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-45265 VersasoVantare Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:42:07 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-45265 I can see where you're coming from. Someone correcting or getting annoyed by isolated spelling errors or typos can come across as petty, after all everyone makes mistakes, but three in a row suggests that something's gone rather wrong. I can see where you’re coming from. Someone correcting or getting annoyed by isolated spelling errors or typos can come across as petty, after all everyone makes mistakes, but three in a row suggests that something’s gone rather wrong.

]]> By: Stugol http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-44350 Stugol Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:18:23 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-44350 I know this is kinda frowned upon here but I just can't stand still for "guy’s who’s name’s". I mean, three words totally moroned up IN A ROW? This is honestly the worst example of apostrophe usage I've EVER seen. Okay. Everyone can call me a jerk now if they want. But I'm still right, and it's still sad that the education system pumps out people who can murder the language so badly as this. I know this is kinda frowned upon here but I just can’t stand still for “guy’s who’s name’s”. I mean, three words totally moroned up IN A ROW? This is honestly the worst example of apostrophe usage I’ve EVER seen.

Okay. Everyone can call me a jerk now if they want. But I’m still right, and it’s still sad that the education system pumps out people who can murder the language so badly as this.

]]> By: SonicBlueRanger http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-44098 SonicBlueRanger Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:37:41 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-44098 I don't know what everyone else is talking about but I think this might be one of my favorite storylines simply because morons like the guy's who's name's I don't know are basically everywhere. I don’t know what everyone else is talking about but I think this might be one of my favorite storylines simply because morons like the guy’s who’s name’s I don’t know are basically everywhere.

]]> By: Menachem Schmuel http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-34792 Menachem Schmuel Mon, 16 May 2011 22:30:56 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-34792 Yeah, but at least Ethan is just thinking it, not saying it. He even told the douche that he was right. Yeah, but at least Ethan is just thinking it, not saying it. He even told the douche that he was right.

]]> By: taekwondogirl http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-29575 taekwondogirl Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:02:35 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-29575 This is what's called a "delayed punchline". This is what’s called a “delayed punchline”.

]]> By: LiamKav http://www.shortpacked.com/2007/comic/book-5/08-the-end-of-shortpacked/resticker/#comment-23135 LiamKav Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:03:11 +0000 http://test.frumph.net/2007/11/16/resticker/#comment-23135 I dunno. I think hammering the point works because the arguments expressed by Dawson and co are repeated constantly by people completely 100% sure that they are in the right. Plus, we needed this page to show that Dawson was right about Ethan, in a way. Everyone gets the fun poked at them, and no-one is arrogant. Thinking otherwise is just...arrogant. I dunno. I think hammering the point works because the arguments expressed by Dawson and co are repeated constantly by people completely 100% sure that they are in the right.

Plus, we needed this page to show that Dawson was right about Ethan, in a way. Everyone gets the fun poked at them, and no-one is arrogant. Thinking otherwise is just…arrogant.

]]>