<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Korea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shortpacked.com/2006/comic/book-3-is-totally-gay/01-cadbury-cereal/korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2006/comic/book-3-is-totally-gay/01-cadbury-cereal/korea/</link>
	<description>Toys are serious business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2006/comic/book-3-is-totally-gay/01-cadbury-cereal/korea/#comment-35051</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2006/04/07/korea/#comment-35051</guid>
		<description>Correct. The joke is about the improvements in action figure sculpting over the years. Both Scarlett and Lady-Jaye are represented by their original action figures, which were okay back in 1982 and 85&#039; respectively, but now look kind of awkward and frumpy compared to newer figures, such as the then -- in 2006 -- brand new DTC Cover Girl action figure.

Back then, a lot of folks were still dumping of the newer GI Joe figures, and comparing them unfavorably to the originals. But most were forced to admit that DTC Cover Girl was a huge improvement over her rather fugly original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct. The joke is about the improvements in action figure sculpting over the years. Both Scarlett and Lady-Jaye are represented by their original action figures, which were okay back in 1982 and 85&#8242; respectively, but now look kind of awkward and frumpy compared to newer figures, such as the then &#8212; in 2006 &#8212; brand new DTC Cover Girl action figure.</p>
<p>Back then, a lot of folks were still dumping of the newer GI Joe figures, and comparing them unfavorably to the originals. But most were forced to admit that DTC Cover Girl was a huge improvement over her rather fugly original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum Polagnus</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2006/comic/book-3-is-totally-gay/01-cadbury-cereal/korea/#comment-33951</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum Polagnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2006/04/07/korea/#comment-33951</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it...  I assume from the tags that it has something to do with G.I. Joe?  And maybe their action figures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it&#8230;  I assume from the tags that it has something to do with G.I. Joe?  And maybe their action figures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pakopako</title>
		<link>http://www.shortpacked.com/2006/comic/book-3-is-totally-gay/01-cadbury-cereal/korea/#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>pakopako</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.frumph.net/2006/04/07/korea/#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>So much articulation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much articulation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
