Shortpacked! by David Willis

Discussion (11) ¬

1. 
   No0ne

   October 25, 2010 at 8:45 pm | # | Reply

   If I were Mr. Willis I wouldn’t have drawn any clothes on Faz… :X

   • 
     Doctor Who

     April 19, 2011 at 10:50 am | # | Reply

     There isn’t a “Damn you, Willis” loud enough to serve as retribution for making us look at a naked Faz.

     • 
       Malph

       August 28, 2011 at 1:02 am | # | Reply

       Hopefully we’ll never find out.
   • 
     jpnuar1

     May 26, 2011 at 11:40 pm | # | Reply

     Naked Faz would have nowhere to wear a name tag.
2. 
   Shadow12000

   January 14, 2011 at 1:21 am | # | Reply

   The power…of boobs!
3. 
   Black Ice

   December 28, 2011 at 6:02 am | # | Reply

   And so it begins.
4. 
   LadyChel

   March 4, 2012 at 1:26 pm | # | Reply

   Grrr, still mad she’s in granny pannies. She’s portrayed as a shy, kinda geeky, little thing with no social life aside from an internet “boyfriend”. Would’ve been the best irony, retribution?, if she’d been a playboy bunny under the uniform.

   • 
     Wack'd

     May 8, 2012 at 3:09 pm | # | Reply

     It would also make no sense from an in-character perspective.

     • 
       Alex

       January 16, 2013 at 12:47 am | # | Reply

       Except that it’s kind of impossible to actually find granny panties in real life. And if you have any butt to speak of, non-granny panties then look vaguely indecent no matter what you do, so maybe Amber’s anachronistic pants are a mercy for her really.
   • 
     Valdrax

     April 7, 2013 at 10:49 am | # | Reply

     …Kind of a weird, creepy thing to say.

     And I agree with the other commenter that it makes no sense from a character perspective for Amber at this time to have anything other than plain, utilitarian underwear.
5. 
   Beastlybro7

   February 19, 2013 at 7:09 pm | # | Reply

   No fax needs more clothes on